Skip to content

Watch your steps: Dormant Adversarial Behaviors that Activate upon LLM Finetuning

May 2025 · 4 citations · 52 references
Computer Science

TL;DR

An attack is proposed, FAB (Finetuning-activated Adversarial Behaviors), which compromises an LLM via meta-learning techniques that simulate downstream finetuning, explicitly optimizing for the emergence of adversarial behaviors in the finetuned models.

Abstract

Finetuning open-weight Large Language Models (LLMs) is standard practice for achieving task-specific performance improvements. Until now, finetuning has been regarded as a controlled and secure process in which training on benign datasets leads to predictable behaviors. In this paper, we demonstrate, for the first time, that an adversary can create compromised LLMs that are performant and benign, yet exhibit adversarial behaviors once finetuned by downstream users. To this end, we propose an attack, FAB (Finetuning-activated Adversarial Behaviors), which compromises an LLM via meta-learning techniques that simulate downstream finetuning, explicitly optimizing for the emergence of adversarial behaviors in the finetuned models. At the same time, the compromised LLM is regularized to retain general capabilities and to exhibit no adversarial behaviors prior to finetuning. As a result, when users finetune (e.g., instruction-tuning, distillation, DPO) the seemingly benign model on their own datasets, they unknowingly trigger its dormant adversarial behavior. We experimentally demonstrate the effectiveness of FAB across multiple LLMs and three commonly considered target behaviors: unsolicited advertising, jailbreakability, and over-refusal. We show that FAB-triggers are robust to various finetuning choices made by the user (e.g., dataset, number of steps, scheduler, post-training algorithm). Our findings challenge prevailing assumptions on the security of finetuning, revealing a critical attack vector.

View source

Similar papers

#artificial intelligence Preprint Oct 2026

Target-free Latent Safety Alignment

Large language models (LLMs) remain highly vulnerable to jailbreak attacks that induce harmful behaviors and circumvent safety alignment. To defend against such attacks, adversarial training paradigms have been proposed to first simulate failure modes and then train the model to correct them, yielding promising improve...

Luo-Yu Chen, Wei-Qi Wang, Chen-Han Zhang et al. · 0 citations
#machine learning Preprint Sep 2026

One Attack to Fool Them All: Highly Transferable Black-Box Adversarial Attacks on Frontier MLLMs

This work proposes O-Attack, a highly transferable black-box attack framework that outperforms six state-of-the-art methods in black-box transferability, with consistent effectiveness across prompts and improved efficiency and imperceptibility.

Sen Nie, Jie Zhang, Zhong Ling Wang et al. · 0 citations
#artificial intelligence Preprint Sep 2026

What Makes Adversarial Examples Transfer Across Deepfake Detectors?

A controlled evaluation of adversarial transferability across 60 detectors spanning six backbones, two pretraining regimes, and five training-data configurations establishes source-model selection as central dimensions of credible transfer-based black-box robustness evaluation.

Rafael M. Mamede, Pedro C. Neto, A. F. Sequeira · 0 citations

Jailbreaking Jailbreaks: A Proactive Defense for LLMs

P RO A CT represents an orthogonal defense strategy that serves as an additional guardrail to enhance LLM safety against the most effective attacks.

Wei-Liang Zhao, Daniel Ben-Levi, Jinjun Peng et al. · 1 citation
#natural language process... Preprint Oct 2026

Reward Stealing Attack on Large Language Models

Adversarial attacks on Large Language Models (LLMs) aim to induce harmful content. However, existing methods suffer from high computational costs or strict model-pairing dependencies, limiting their scalability and transferability. We propose Reward Stealing Attack (ReSA), an adversarial attack framework that targets t...

Jia-Ming Qian, Peng-Yang Zhou, Jia-He Xu et al. · 0 citations

Related blog posts

MIT News · Artificial Intelligence Sep 29, 2026

Who we become when we talk to machines

Professor Sherry Turkle’s new book, “Artificial Intimacy,” offers a withering critique of chatbots and the antisocial dynamics she believes they encourage.

We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads. See our Cookie Policy.