StructSynth is introduced, a framework that treats a dependency graph as a generation plan---determining the generation order, conditioning context, and scope of each black-box LLM call, and achieves state-of-the-art downstream utility and the best privacy-risk ranking among fourteen compared generators in low-data settings.
Abstract
Tabular data derives its value from inter-feature dependencies, yet preserving them during synthesis is fragile when samples are scarce. Existing approaches either learn dependencies implicitly through distribution fitting, rely on statistical graph learning that becomes unstable with few samples, or encode structure through flat text serialization. Recent graph-aware methods use dependency graphs as attention biases or as backbones for non-LLM samplers, but they do not use the graph as a prompt-level plan for organizing the LLM's own generation process. We introduce StructSynth, a framework that treats a dependency graph as a generation plan---determining the generation order, conditioning context, and scope of each black-box LLM call. In Evidence-Grounded Graph Induction, LLM reasoning and statistical association cues jointly construct a Directed Acyclic Graph (DAG) from limited samples. In Graph-Planned Conditional Synthesis, this DAG drives autoregressive synthesis in topological order, conditioning each feature on previously generated values with graph-specified parent structure guiding each step, making the conditioning schedule explicit throughout synthesis. Experiments show that StructSynth achieves state-of-the-art downstream utility and the best privacy-risk ranking among fourteen compared generators in low-data settings.
Flat machine learning models fit training-distribution statistics and degrade when that distribution shifts at test time. We present a cross-domain research arc demonstrating that hierarchical structured abstraction, which decomposes a prediction task into fewer, topologically-grounded decisions over domain-specific pr...
The Graph Theory Agent (GTA), which pairs a preference-trained representation selector with plan-and-decompose scaffolding around a frozen executor LLM, is proposed, which lifts Phi-4 from 53.5% to 69.1% on the benchmark's easy split and from 33.0% to 41.5% on its hard split.
Zi-Xiang Xu, Yan-Bo Wang, Chenxi Wang et al.· 3 citations· ⚡1
A hybrid LLM-guided Bayesian network structure-learning framework that uses LLMs as bounded semantic guides, and shows that language-derived semantic knowledge can substantially improve scalable probabilistic structure learning when used as bounded guidance within a statistically grounded reasoning pipeline.
Jackson Hassell, Chen Shen, Estevam Hruschka· 0 citations
This work investigates context construction for node-level graph ICL: which labeled nodes and auxiliary unlabeled nodes should constitute the prompt for specified queries, and identifies when retrieval channels work best and connects their behavior with graph properties.
Ming-Qi Yang, Zi-Dong-Wei-Zhi-Yuan-He-Tongtang Guo, Ji-Hui Yang et al.· 1 citation
This survey examines how these methods integrate graphs into various stages of the LLM pipeline, including the input, model, and output phases, and outlines the challenges and future research directions for developing more efficient and interpretable solutions.
Xin-Yan Zhu, Cheng Yang, Qiu-Yue Wang et al.· Proceedings of the Thirty-Fi...· 0 citations
Multimodal large language models process the complete visual token sequence, increasing prefill cost even when many tokens are irrelevant to the instruction. Token-wise saliency captures limited inter-token dependence; graph-based selection instead depends on how relations govern importance propagation and ranking. We...
Xiao-Yang Ma, Chi Wang, Hong Sun· 0 citations
Related blog posts
MIT News · Artificial Intelligence· news.mit.eduOct 13, 2026
Machine-learning networks can learn without detailed instructions from a designer. Those that do may offer insight into how the brain reorganizes itself during learning.
MIT News · Artificial Intelligence· news.mit.eduSep 29, 2026
Professor Sherry Turkle’s new book, “Artificial Intimacy,” offers a withering critique of chatbots and the antisocial dynamics she believes they encourage.