SciAtlas is presented, a shared, machine-actionable cross-disciplinary scholarly knowledge infrastructure that integrates evidential, conceptual, disciplinary, expertise, and normative layers under a shared schema and achieves a unified neuro-symbolic retrieval mechanism that grounds heterogeneous research objects, propagates relevance across the scholarly topology, and projects the resulting relevance field into the context required by each scientific workflow.
Abstract
Artificial intelligence is rapidly entering the core workflows of scientific research. Yet reliable scientific reasoning requires access to accumulated scientific knowledge with sufficient breadth, depth, and standardization. Current AI scientists typically assemble scientific knowledge through workflow- and discipline-specific pipelines, which provide incomplete coverage, leave relations implicit, and make knowledge acquisition pathways fragmented. Here we present SciAtlas, a shared, machine-actionable cross-disciplinary scholarly knowledge infrastructure that integrates evidential, conceptual, disciplinary, expertise, and normative layers under a shared schema. SciAtlas further achieves a unified neuro-symbolic retrieval mechanism that grounds heterogeneous research objects, propagates relevance across the scholarly topology, and projects the resulting relevance field into the context required by each scientific workflow. Across three representative workflows, SciAtlas broadens trajectory reconstruction by recovering overlooked research branches, deepens opportunity discovery by uncovering underexplored bottlenecks and cross-domain insights, and strengthens innovation assessment by integrating evidence, expertise, and evaluation signals. Across three representative workflows, SciAtlas broadens trajectory reconstruction by recovering overlooked stages and branches, deepens opportunity discovery by uncovering underexplored bottlenecks and cross-domain connections, and standardizes innovation assessment by integrating evidence, expertise and evaluation signals. Extensive evaluations validate the foundational capabilities underpinning it as reusable knowledge infrastructure for knowledge-intensive scientific research.
Results indicate that SciDSK improves how agents locate and understand scientific datasets, providing a stronger foundation for actionable scientific data use.
Xiao-Han Huang, Qing-Qing Long, Xiaolei Du et al.· 0 citations
The introduction of ScientistTwo, a fully autonomous multi-agent framework designed to realize problem-driven autonomous research, and its results show that ScientistTwo is not merely an assistive tool but an autonomous scientific pioneer capable of pushing the frontiers of human discovery.
Jaehyun Nam, Jinsung Yoon, Yan Pan et al.· Robotics· 0 citations
This work introduces SciDocBench, a workflow-centered benchmark targeting capability diagnosis with verifiable training-data construction for scientific-document assistants, and SciDocIR, a structured representation of scientific document objects, layout and cross-reference relations, and provenance.
Shen-Xi Wu, Yu-Hong Liu, Hao-Song Zhang et al.· 1 citation
Scientific literature synthesis agents increasingly rely on proprietary online services, limiting reproducibility, privacy, and offline deployment. To address this challenge, we introduce SciLENS Scientific Localized Evidence Navigation and Synthesis), a fully local autonomous agent framework operating on a dual-tier i...
Le-Qi Zheng, Jin-Bo Su, Yu-Ying Li et al.· 1 citation
OpenDiscoveryTrace, a public dataset of 558 complete AI scientific agent trajectories that captures how models reason, not just what they produce, is presented to support research on process-level evaluation, scientific agent auditing, and AI governance.
Aayam Bansal, K. Balaji· 0 citations
Related blog posts
MIT News · Artificial Intelligence· news.mit.eduOct 13, 2026
Machine-learning networks can learn without detailed instructions from a designer. Those that do may offer insight into how the brain reorganizes itself during learning.
MIT News · Artificial Intelligence· news.mit.eduSep 29, 2026
Professor Sherry Turkle’s new book, “Artificial Intimacy,” offers a withering critique of chatbots and the antisocial dynamics she believes they encourage.