IndicDetect provides standard data splits, an evaluation protocol, and baselines to establish a robust, language-aware foundation for AI-generated text detection in Indic scripts, and finds substantial robustness failures.
Abstract
The rapid proliferation of LLMs has further heightened the need to develop dependable AI-generated text detection, especially beyond English. Nevertheless, current benchmarks pay little attention to Indic languages and test detectors in idealized settings that do not represent the real world. We present a generalized benchmark for AI-generated text detection in Hindi, Telugu, and Tamil, which we call IndicDetect, designed to assess the robustness of detectors under realistic distribution shifts. IndicDetect comprises highly curated human-written texts matched with LLM-generated counterparts across various domains and generators, and systematically evaluates detectors in the presence of domain shift, generator shift, and adversarial perturbation. Using a single and repeatable evaluation scheme, we evaluate a wide range of statistical and neural detectors. We find substantial robustness failures: supervised neural detectors perform well in-distribution, while training-free methods degrade considerably under unseen generators and adversarial attacks. The severity of these failures varies across languages, with Hindi exhibiting the largest overall degradation under adversarial perturbations. These results highlight that the primary weakness of existing detectors in Indic settings lies in their robustness, not in their peak accuracy. IndicDetect provides standard data splits, an evaluation protocol, and baselines to establish a robust, language-aware foundation for AI-generated text detection in Indic scripts.
Robust detection of AI-generated text under deployment conditions is challenging: distribution shifts across domains and generators, adversarial perturbations of the input surface, and the absence of target-domain labels for threshold calibration all degrade detectors that perform well in-domain. We present DeBERTa-Con...
Mohamed Mady, Yu-Pei Li, Johannes Reschke et al.· 0 citations
AI text generators are usually evaluated with their output being fed directly into detectors, while in actuality, users tend to paraphrase or back-translate texts before submitting them to be graded. In the following study, four detectors are tested at each of five increasing levels of attacks based on HC3, RAID, and M...
Batyr Sharimbayev, S. Kadyrov, Adil Akhmetov et al.· 2026 IEEE 1st International...· 0 citations
The core of VaryBalance is that, compared to LLM-generated texts, there is a greater difference between human texts and their rewritten version via LLMs, and quantifies this through Mean Squared Deviation and distinguishes human texts and LLM-generated texts.
Xue-Cong Li, Xiao-Hong Li, Qiang Hu et al.· Proceedings of the Thirty-Fi...· 0 citations
This work systematically evaluates 15 LLMs spanning three model generations as both generators and detectors, revealing that detection efficacy is primarily driven by detector capability rather than generator provenance, although outputs from newer generators remain notably harder to detect.
Hai-Yue Yuan, Jie Guo, Wei-Dong Qiu et al.· 0 citations
As LLM-generated content becomes more sophisticated, detection systems for distinguishing those texts from human-written text must operate at scale while handling diverse writing styles, domains, languages, and generator models. Input-only encoder detectors are suitable for practical deployment setting, but standard bi...
Jinmo Han, Ji-Min Hong, C. Moon et al.· 0 citations
MultiGhostBench is introduced, a multilingual benchmark comprising 928 books generated by five recent LLMs across six languages and three scripts, with an average length of approximately 59K words per book, that supports evaluation under domain, author, and language shifts.
M. Greco, Anudeex Shetty, Andrea Tagarelli et al.· 0 citations