Aug 2026· European Conference on Knowledge Management· 0 citations· 21 references
TL;DR
The paper concludes that the future of KMS lies not in more sophisticated repositories, but in intelligent systems capable of dynamic codification, contextual reasoning, and continuous organisational learning, redefining the balance between human and machine agency in organisational knowledge processes.
Abstract
The rapid advancement of artificial intelligence is fundamentally reshaping the architecture and logic of Knowledge Management Systems (KMS). Traditionally, KMS have been designed around repositories, taxonomies, and retrieval mechanisms for storing and redistributing explicit knowledge. However, in the AI era – particularly with the emergence of generative models – the role of KMS extends beyond storage and retrieval, towards active participation in knowledge processing and knowledge creation. This paper examines the evolution of KMS in the AI era through the lens of the SECI model (Socialisation, Externalisation, Combination, Internalization). It argues that AI tools can introduce a new operational dynamic within each SECI phase if properly addressed. In the externalisation process, AI systems can facilitate the conversion of tacit and loosely articulated insights into structured representations. In the combination phase, machine learning models may enable pattern discovery and synthesis across heterogeneous knowledge sources. During internalisation, AI-powered assistants can support experiential learning by contextualising and personalising information. Most importantly, socialisation can be augmented through collaborative AI-mediated environments that enhance collective intelligence, reshaping how shared meaning is constructed. The study critically explores how AI-enhanced KMS can transform from passive infrastructures to evolve into adaptive cognitive systems supporting KM. While AI may increase speed, scalability, and pattern recognition, it also introduces epistemological risks – such as bias propagation, over-automation, and erosion of human judgment. The paper discusses how organisations can mitigate these risks while developing resilient and adaptive KM practices. Adopting a conceptual and integrative approach, the research analyses current technological capabilities and conceptual KM frameworks. This research proposes an updated perspective on KMS as a hybrid socio-technical ecosystem. In such systems, AI tools do not replace human knowledge actors but extend their cognitive and organisational capacities. The paper concludes that the future of KMS lies not in more sophisticated repositories, but in intelligent systems capable of dynamic codification, contextual reasoning, and continuous organisational learning, redefining the balance between human and machine agency in organisational knowledge processes.
The paper contributes to KM research by reframing KM as a system design challenge for AI-enabled execution and by positioning governance, validation and feedback control as central mechanisms for reliable organisational knowledge use.
Sara Michelazzo, Parmeet Kaur, Saurabh Saxena· European Conference on Knowl...· 0 citations
The architecture of AI-KMS is examined, focusing on components like knowledge acquisition modules, inference engines, and user interfaces, along with the integration of deep learning and ontologies for improved knowledge representation, which shows improved accuracy in knowledge retrieval and decision-making efficiency...
Zainab J. Yusuf, Vinoj M· International Journal of Art...· 0 citations
The results demonstrate that AI enhances knowledge creation, sharing, and decision-making when embedded within human-centred and learning-oriented organisational environments and highlight the need for organisations to balance technological innovation with human capability development and ethical governance to ensure e...
Lindokuhle Vuyisile Bridget Mkhize, M. Subban· European Conference on Knowl...· 0 citations
The rapid evolution of Generative AI (GenAI) has transformed the ways in which knowledge is created, shared, interpreted, and applied in organization and educational contexts. While earlier studies have often focused on the technical capabilities of GenAI or on the detection of synthetic content, less attention has bee...
Anastasiia Iufereva, Peter Mozelius· European Conference on Knowl...· 0 citations
The paper compares the three different conceptual approaches adopted by scholars in dealing with the topic in question, highlighting how they assume different notions of the role of GenAI in the knowledge creation process and the types of knowledge involved.
E. Scarso, K. Kirchner· European Conference on Knowl...· 0 citations
The agentic era has arrived, marking a shift from passive generative artificial intelligence (GenAI) systems to autonomous AI systems which possess the ability to act on behalf of the user. The increased autonomy, rapid decision-making, and the growing presence of intelligent and self-directed systems, that is charact...
P. Lefika· European Conference on Knowl...· 0 citations
We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads.
See our Cookie Policy.