Skip to content
Open access

Encounter Ontology: Relational Intelligence and Generative Emergence in Human–AI Interaction

Jul 2026 · Electronics · Vol 15, pp. 3218 · 0 citations · 18 references

TL;DR

This paper proposes encounter ontology as the conceptual framework that names it, arguing that the encounter constitutes a distinct ontological site irreducible to either human or machine ontology alone.

Abstract

Meaning no longer resides where we assumed it did. At the scale of hundreds of millions of daily human–AI encounters, intelligent systems have ceased to function as external tools and have become the constitutive environment through which thought, interpretation, and knowledge formation occur. Yet dominant frameworks remain anchored to a unit of analysis that does not capture what is actually happening: they measure outputs, govern behaviours, and optimise performance, while the encounter itself remains theoretically unnamed. This paper proposes encounter ontology as the conceptual framework that names it, arguing that the encounter constitutes a distinct ontological site irreducible to either human or machine ontology alone. Human–AI interaction is not only transmissive but generative: the encounter produces interpretations, conceptual formations, and altered cognition irreducible to either the user’s original intent or the model’s specified behaviour. Building on new materialist philosophy, assemblage theory, agential realism, and the philosophy of technics, the paper introduces relational intelligence as the emergent co-production of meaning across situated human–AI interactions sustained over time, situated within Floridi’s concept of hyperhistory. The encounter generates epistemic trajectories that are not merely unknown prior to the interaction but genuinely undetermined, brought into form through the relational event itself rather than retrieved from either participant. The paper examines implications for alignment, explainability, and governance, introducing the specification–emergence gap as a constitutive rather than contingent feature of intelligent interaction. Three design orientations are developed toward operationalisation: design for temporal continuity, design for encounter quality, and design for symbolic legibility. The paper contributes a theoretically grounded vocabulary for analysing human–AI co-emergence and extending intelligent system design toward more relationally aware and responsibly governed AI.

Read PDF

Similar papers

Open access Sep 2026

Informational self meaning as a structural theory in artificial intelligence ontology and epistemology

This paper introduces the concept of informational self-meaning (ISM) as a philosophical account for addressing AI ontology and epistemology, providing a conceptual foundation for gradualist models of AI recognition in legal and ethical contexts.

Jae-Eung Yu · 0 citations
Open access Aug 2026

Beyond Substance: Contemporary Science and the Case for a Generative Relational Ontology

Contemporary science has achieved extraordinary explanatory and predictive success, yet its ontological interpretation remains unsettled. This paper argues that one source of this instability lies in the inherited assumption that reality is fundamentally composed of independently existing substances. While this picture...

Erik Axelkrans · 0 citations
Open access Sep 2026

Figurative discourse about AI: A Combined Input Hypothesis analysis

Public discourse about Artificial Intelligence (AI) relies on figurative language as a semiotic resource for conceptualising the technology. While previous research has examined metaphor and metonymy in such discourse, less attention has been paid to how these processes interact in shaping figurative construals of AI....

Ghsoon Reda · 0 citations
Open access 2026

AI and the Transformation of Scientific Knowledge

This article proposes a rethinking of the role of artificial intelligence in contemporary science through an analysis of Harry Collins’s concept of expertise. The point of departure is the observed tension between normative accounts of expertise – grounded in ideas of socialisation, tacit knowledge and membership in a...

A. Filatova · 0 citations

We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads. See our Cookie Policy.