Jul 2026· Journal of Professional Capital and Community· pp. 1-21· 0 citations· 57 references
TL;DR
The findings reveal that all three capitals remain central but are being reshaped, suggesting that professional capital in the AI era is no longer static but is instead integrative and future-oriented.
Abstract
The rapid evolution of artificial intelligence (AI) is transforming education and creating new challenges for school leadership. The purpose of this study is to examine how principals' leadership for AI adoption has been represented in recent scholarship and to reconceptualize the framework of professional capital in light of these developments.
Methodologically, the study adheres to the PRISMA 2020 Guidelines to conduct a systematic review of 37 peer-reviewed articles published up to July 2025. Data were extracted and synthesized using a framework-based coding process guided by Hargreaves and Fullan's (2015) concept of professional capital. Studies were coded deductively into human, social, and decisional capital, with inductive analysis identifying new themes specific to the AI era.
The findings reveal that all three capitals remain central but are being reshaped. Human capital now encompasses AI literacy, techno-ethical knowledge, and continuous learning. Social capital extends beyond school communities to include partnerships with technology providers, policymakers, and parents. Decisional capital is increasingly defined by human-in-the-loop oversight, algorithmic judgment, and adaptive contextualization. These transformations suggest that professional capital in the AI era is no longer static but is instead integrative and future-oriented.
The study's originality lies in proposing the concept of digital-adaptive capital, an emergent meta-capacity that combines technological fluency, ethical discretion, and adaptive responsiveness. This reconceptualization extends professional capital theory and offers a framework for preparing and supporting principals to lead schools through conditions of continual technological change.
Meta-Noetic Leadership is introduced as an emerging human-centred theory for educational leadership in the era of the Fifth Industrial Revolution and theoretical propositions and implications for responsible AI readiness, psychological safety, and systemic antifragility in schools are formulating.
Georgios Panagiotopoulos, Georgios Samaras, Zoe Karanikola et al.· European Journal of Contempo...· 0 citations
Findings tentatively suggest that GenAI use is becoming socially normalised and potentially habitual among students, with TPB providing only partial explanatory power.
ImeObong Effiong, C. Effiong· BMC Medical Education· 0 citations
This article examines the mapping and reconceptualization of Human Resource Development (HRD) within educational institutions through a Systematic Literature Review (SLR) combined with bibliometric analysis. The study is grounded in the need to contextualize HRD in the education sector, as most HRD literature remains d...
Liah Siti Syarifah, A. Suryana, Aip Syaepul Uyun et al.· Jurnal At-Tadbir : Media Huk...· 0 citations
Corporate universities have become a recurrent reference point in debates about how organizations build human capital, yet the term carries two largely disconnected meanings: a firm-operated learning-and-development (L&D) institution and a critical shorthand for the corporatized, managerialist transformation of higher...
F. Sembiring, J. Sojanah, Juliana et al.· Human Resources Management a...· 0 citations
An interpretive framework linking six leadership competencies - digital literacy, strategic foresight, ethical judgement, ethical judgement, emotional intelligence, adaptive change capacity and distributed collaboration - to governance, policy, professional development, resourcing and accountability mechanisms is devel...
Inga Olari· International Journal of Bus...· 0 citations