Skip to content

Can Agents Truly Forget? Explore Machine Unlearning for LLM Agents

Oct 2026 · 1 citation · 36 references
Computer Science

TL;DR

The introduced Agent Unlearning Benchmark (AUBench), a controlled benchmark that extends the fictitious-author setting of TOFU into an agent environment with persistent memory, an offline web snapshot, tool-accessible documents, and provenance-tracked interaction trajectories, and provides a foundation for developing unlearning methods that operate across the full lifecycle of LLM agents.

Abstract

Large language model (LLM) agents have shown strong capabilities in interactive problem solving, tool use, and long-horizon task execution. However, they may also acquire sensitive or private knowledge during training and expose it during deployment. Retraining a model from scratch to remove such knowledge is prohibitively costly, making machine unlearning a more practical approach. Machine unlearning aims to remove targeted undesirable knowledge from trained models without retraining from scratch while preserving general utility. When language models are deployed as agents, parameter-level unlearning becomes insufficient: forgotten information may still persist in memory artifacts or be reacquired via tool calls. In this paper, we formulate the problem of agent unlearning as removing private information from an LLM-based agent across three information channels: parametric knowledge, persistent memory, and tool-call acquisition. To study this problem, we introduce we introduce Agent Unlearning Benchmark (AUBench), a controlled benchmark that extends the fictitious-author setting of TOFU into an agent environment with persistent memory, an offline web snapshot, tool-accessible documents, and provenance-tracked interaction trajectories. By evaluating existing parameter-level and memory-level unlearning methods in this setting, AUBench reveals the gap between model-level forgetting and system-level agent unlearning, and provides a foundation for developing unlearning methods that operate across the full lifecycle of LLM agents.

View source

Similar papers

Trajectory Unlearning on LLM-based Agents

Existing large language model (LLM) unlearning has focused primarily on removing specific knowledge, such as harmful facts, private data, or copyrighted content. However, as LLMs are increasingly deployed as autonomous agents, a fundamental yet overlooked problem emerges: beyond suppressing what an agent knows, an agen...

Ying-Dan Shi, Ren Wang · 0 citations
#artificial intelligence Preprint Oct 2026

Can Agents Forget When Asked? A Benchmark for Memory Unlearning in LLM Agents

Long-term memory has become a core component of large language model (LLM) agents. As agents accumulate personal information over long-term use, users increasingly ask them to delete sensitive or outdated facts. A memory system should honor such requests. It should remove exactly what was requested and keep the rest of...

Bo-Fan Xie, Chao-Kun Wang, Guan-Chen Ge et al. · 0 citations
#machine learning Preprint Nov 2026

Forget What Comes Next: LLM Unlearning via Statistical Independence

Large language models (LLMs) can memorize and reproduce fragments of their training data, raising privacy and legal concerns that motivate machine unlearning. Yet poisoned training examples can remain statistically detectable after unlearning, which raises the question of whether current unlearning objectives remove wh...

Andrii Shkabrii, Claudia Plant, Martin Pawelczyk · 0 citations

UnlearningSoup: Is Repeated Tuning Necessary for Large Language Model Unlearning?

Whether unlearning runs exhibit exploitable structure in weight space is investigated, and it is observed that models from different runs still lie in a shared evaluation-performance basin, suggesting that stronger models may be recovered through an unlearning-tailored soup strategy, reducing the need for repeated tuni...

Pu-Ning Yang, Qi-Zhou Wang, Jun-Chi Yu et al. · 0 citations
#artificial intelligence Preprint Oct 2026

SAPD: Learning from Agent Experience without Environment Interaction

Step-Advantage Policy Distillation (SAPD) is proposed, a method for learning from offline trajectories using relative step advantages, allowing the student to generate responses conditioned on recorded histories, and introduces relative step advantage signals to stabilize training.

Jun-Cheng Diao, Hai-Bin Wang, Wei Shi et al. · 0 citations

Test-Time Unlearning via Sparse Autoencoder

This work proposes ARIA (autoencoder-gated inference-time unlearning), a test-time unlearning method that leaves model weights intact and gates access to unwanted knowledge only when generation enters a forget-related state and introduces three post-unlearning adversarial attacks targeting weight-space and decoding-spa...

Ping-Zhi Li, Jinhao Duan, Vaishnav Tadiparthi et al. · 1 citation

Related blog posts

Hugging Face Blog Nov 10, 2026

Decision Models in Hugging Face

We’re on a journey to advance and democratize artificial intelligence through open source and open science.

We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads. See our Cookie Policy.