Large multimodal models (LMMs) need to understand how entities move and interact as a scene develops. This requires following the same entities over time and relating their observed motion to subsequent changes. We formulate Scene Evolution Understanding (SEU), a task for predicting and interpreting this change. Given observed video, a model estimates entity histories and predicts one scene continuation through future trajectories and Events, accompanied by Visual Evidence from observed motion and a scene description. We construct SceneForesee, a benchmark for evaluating entity continuity and scene evolution reasoning through paired observed and future scenes with shared entity identities. It contains 144.57K temporal pairs, 1.05M entity correspondences, and 272.49K Events paired with observed evidence. We propose a spatiotemporal reasoning framework, EvoSee, that learns future geometry and Event semantics through shared candidate states and joint assignment. It selects one continuation per entity from observation and uses the selected changes for entity refinement, retention, and scene representation. On SceneForesee, EvoSee outperforms Qwen3.5-9B by 10.45 points in Combined Point-F1 and 17.24 points in Event Global F1. On the 4D reasoning benchmark Dyn-Bench, it improves question answering accuracy and grounding J&F by 4.8 and 3.58 points over their respective base systems. These results support scene evolution as both a prediction target and a dynamic representation that brings predicted entity changes into spatiotemporal reasoning.The project is available at https://github.com/mikubaka88/SceneForesee-Spatiotemporal-Reasoning.
This paper investigates developing real-world perception for active agents, proposes Gibson Environment for this purpose, and showcases a set of perceptual tasks learned therein.
F. Xia, Amir Zamir, Zhi-Yang He et al.· 2018 IEEE/CVF Conference on...· 1,069 citations· ⚡112
This publication proposes a definition and a classification of agile software development approaches and analyses ten software development methods that can be characterized as being "agile" against the defined criterion.
P. Abrahamsson, O. Salo, Jussi Ronkainen et al.· arXiv.org· 727 citations· ⚡54
The study shows that agile practices improve both informal and formal communication, but indicates that, in larger development situations involving multiple external stakeholders, a mismatch of adequate communication mechanisms can sometimes even hinder the communication.
M. Pikkarainen, Jukka Haikara, O. Salo et al.· Empirical Software Engineeri...· 401 citations· ⚡48
The results indicate that software engineering work practices are chosen opportunistically, adapted and configured to provide value under the constrains imposed by the startup context.
Nicolò Paternoster, Carmine Giardino, M. Unterkalmsteiner et al.· Information and Software Tec...· 394 citations· ⚡54
The possibility of inferring high-dimensional data inference in a model that consists of a prior and an auxiliary differentiable constraint given some additional information is considered, thereby allowing a range of potential applications in adapting models to new domains and tasks.
Alexandros Graikos, Esmeralda S. Whitammer, N. Jojic et al.· Neural Information Processin...· 316 citations· ⚡15
Known for his clear and elegant writing style, Bertsekas shaped fields from control and optimization to large-scale computation and artificial intelligence.