This work introduces OracleProto, a reproducible framework for evaluating LLM forecasting in a controlled, temporally masked environment, and retains resolved forecasting tasks as reusable evaluation resources under explicit temporal boundaries, supporting continual accumulation of forecasting datasets and systematic evaluation of forecasting capabilities.
Abstract
Forecasting is a composite capability encompassing information gathering, evidence integration, situational assessment, and decision-making. Large language models (LLMs) combine reasoning and tool use, offering new avenues for automated forecasting and decision support. Yet LLM forecasting evaluation faces a structural challenge: live benchmarks support prospective assessment, but limited question reuse and changing information conditions make results difficult to reproduce and compare; retrospective benchmarks offer reproducibility but risk information leakage. We introduce OracleProto, a reproducible framework for evaluating LLM forecasting in a controlled, temporally masked environment. Through model knowledge cutoff constraints and temporal masking, OracleProto constructs a temporal sandbox for real-world web retrieval, audits information boundaries through leakage detection, and reconstructs resolved events as forecasting instances. Discrete answer normalization and hierarchical scoring enable unified evaluation. We evaluate 27 model-configuration pairs on 300 FutureX-Past-derived questions over 24,300 prediction trials, assessing forecasting quality, sampling stability, and cost efficiency under controlled information boundaries. An audit finds only 1.37% residual leakage in retrieval results after temporal masking and leakage filtering. OracleProto retains resolved forecasting tasks as reusable evaluation resources under explicit temporal boundaries, supporting continual accumulation of forecasting datasets and systematic evaluation of forecasting capabilities. Code is available at https://anonymous.4open.science/r/OracleProto-2E3A/.
GAOKAO-Bench is introduced, an intuitive benchmark that employs questions from the Chinese GAOKAO examination as test samples, including both subjective and objective questions that contribute a robust evaluation benchmark for future large language models and offers valuable insights into the advantages and limitations...
Xiaotian Zhang, Chun-yan Li, Yi Zong et al.· arXiv.org· 216 citations· ⚡17
An algorithm is proposed which leverages disentangled semantic factors to generate adversarial perturbation by altering controlled semantic attributes to fool the learner towards various "adversarial" targets.
Haonan Qiu, Chaowei Xiao, Lei Yang et al.· arXiv.org· 208 citations· ⚡17
This work proposes a HALO that directly maximizes the utility of generations instead of maximizing the log-likelihood of preferences, and suggests that the best loss depends on the inductive biases most appropriate for a given setting, an oft-overlooked consideration.
This work investigates the possibilities of using LLMs in a resume screening setting via a document retrieval framework that simulates job candidate selection and finds that the MTEs are biased, significantly favoring White-associated names in 85% of cases and female-associated names in only 11.1% of cases.
This work shows that orders of magnitude enhancement in performance could be obtained by a combination of hardware improvements and tight quantum-HPC integration and introduces high-performance architectures for quantum-probabilistic computing with custom-designed accelerators to tackle today's industry-scale classical...
Masoud Mohseni, Artur Scherer, K. Johnson et al.· arXiv.org· 121 citations· ⚡9
This paper presents a comprehensive overview of the Ultralytics YOLO family, emphasizing architectural evolution, benchmarking, deployment, and emerging directions from YOLOv5 through YOLO27, and examines detection, segmentation, depth, classification, pose, oriented detection, tracking, export, quantization, and deplo...