Skip to content
#artificial intelligence Book Open access

The New World Order "Who controls the Algorithms"

Oct 2026 · Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Social Media and Politics

Abstract

The twenty-first century has witnessed the emergence of a new form of political power: algorithmic power. Unlike the conventional instruments of political influence, which operated through military strength, diplomatic pressure, economic sanctions, intelligence networks, mass media and direct political intervention, algorithmic power operates through digital platforms, artificial intelligence, recommendation systems, search engines, content moderation, data extraction and the invisible architecture through which billions of people receive and interpret information. Who Controls the Algorithm? investigates the growing influence of Western-owned artificial intelligence and social media platforms over Africa's political information environment and asks a fundamental question: Who determines what Africans see, what they discuss, what becomes politically important, whose voice gains visibility, and whose voice disappears into digital obscurity? The book argues that control over digital infrastructure increasingly constitutes a form of political power. Platforms that control the underlying technological systems can influence the distribution of information without necessarily exercising direct political authority. Through ranking systems, recommendation algorithms, automated moderation, advertising technologies, search results, trending mechanisms and artificial intelligence-generated content, digital platforms can shape the information environments within which citizens form political opinions and make electoral choices. The book does not assume that every political outcome is deliberately engineered by technology companies or Western governments. Rather, it examines the structural power created by the ownership, design and governance of digital platforms. It distinguishes between intentional political manipulation, commercial incentives, algorithmic bias, technological design choices, unintended amplification and the broader geopolitical consequences of digital dependency. Particular attention is given to Africa's political environment. The book examines how digital platforms can influence the visibility of political leaders, opposition movements, journalists, activists, policy arguments and social movements. It explores how certain narratives can become highly amplified while others remain marginal, how political communication is increasingly dependent upon privately controlled platforms, and how African states and citizens can become dependent upon technologies whose rules, infrastructures, data systems and corporate governance are largely determined outside the continent. The book further examines the relationship between artificial intelligence and political sovereignty. As AI systems increasingly mediate search, information discovery, translation, political communication, content production and public discourse, questions of ownership become questions of sovereignty. Who trains the models? Who owns the data? Who determines what constitutes legitimate information? Whose historical knowledge is represented? Whose political narratives are classified as credible, dangerous, misleading or insignificant? And what happens when African societies depend upon foreign technological systems to interpret African political realities? A central argument of the book is that digital colonialism can emerge without formal territorial occupation. Control may instead be exercised through data, infrastructure, platforms, cloud systems, algorithms, digital advertising markets, artificial intelligence models and technological standards. The book therefore places contemporary digital power within the broader historical experience of colonialism, economic dependency and struggles for African self-determination, while recognizing that today's technological environment is more complex than a simple continuation of colonial rule. The work also investigates the political economy of attention. In the digital age, public attention has become a valuable economic and political resource. Political parties, governments, corporations, activists, journalists and social movements compete for visibility within systems designed primarily by private technology companies. The ability to reach millions of citizens can therefore depend not only on the strength of an argument but also on the architecture of the platform through which that argument is communicated. The book ultimately advances a case for African digital sovereignty. Such sovereignty does not require Africa to isolate itself from global technology. Instead, it requires African countries to develop the institutional, technological, legal, economic and intellectual capacity to participate in the digital world on more equal terms. This includes investment in African-owned digital infrastructure, responsible AI research, regional data governance, African language technologies, transparent algorithmic accountability, cybersecurity, digital literacy, independent research institutions and stronger cooperation among African states. The book proposes that the struggle for African sovereignty has entered a new arena. The question is no longer simply who controls territory, natural resources, financial institutions or conventional media. It is increasingly a question of who controls the systems that organize knowledge, attention and political visibility. Who Controls the Algorithm? therefore presents digital sovereignty as an essential component of twenty-first-century African sovereignty. It calls upon African governments, universities, researchers, technology entrepreneurs, civil society organizations, journalists and citizens to move from being predominantly consumers of foreign digital technologies to becoming active owners, designers, regulators and intellectual architects of Africa's digital future. At its core, this book is a call for algorithmic self-determination: the principle that African societies should possess meaningful agency over the technologies that increasingly influence how they understand themselves, their politics, their leaders, their economies and their future. The central question is consequently not merely whether algorithms influence African politics. The deeper question is whether Africa will remain primarily a consumer of algorithms designed elsewhere, or whether it will develop the technological sovereignty necessary to help determine the algorithms, platforms and artificial intelligence systems that shape its own destiny.

View source

Similar papers

#artificial intelligence Conference Open access Jun 2018

Gibson Env: Real-World Perception for Embodied Agents

This paper investigates developing real-world perception for active agents, proposes Gibson Environment for this purpose, and showcases a set of perceptual tasks learned therein.

F. Xia, Amir Zamir, Zhi-Yang He et al. · 1,069 citations · ⚡112
#artificial intelligence Open access May 2023

Evaluating the Performance of Large Language Models on GAOKAO Benchmark

GAOKAO-Bench is introduced, an intuitive benchmark that employs questions from the Chinese GAOKAO examination as test samples, including both subjective and objective questions that contribute a robust evaluation benchmark for future large language models and offers valuable insights into the advantages and limitations...

Xiaotian Zhang, Chun-yan Li, Yi Zong et al. · 216 citations · ⚡17

KTO: Model Alignment as Prospect Theoretic Optimization

This work proposes a HALO that directly maximizes the utility of generations instead of maximizing the log-likelihood of preferences, and suggests that the best loss depends on the inductive biases most appropriate for a given setting, an oft-overlooked consideration.

Kawin Ethayarajh, Winnie Xu, Niklas Muennighoff et al. · 195 citations · ⚡28
#artificial intelligence Open access Jul 2024

Gender, Race, and Intersectional Bias in Resume Screening via Language Model Retrieval

This work investigates the possibilities of using LLMs in a resume screening setting via a document retrieval framework that simulates job candidate selection and finds that the MTEs are biased, significantly favoring White-associated names in 85% of cases and female-associated names in only 11.1% of cases.

Kyra Wilson, Aylin Caliskan · 131 citations · ⚡8
#artificial intelligence Review Nov 2024

How to Build a Quantum Supercomputer: Scaling from Hundreds to Millions of Qubits

This work shows that orders of magnitude enhancement in performance could be obtained by a combination of hardware improvements and tight quantum-HPC integration and introduces high-performance architectures for quantum-probabilistic computing with custom-designed accelerators to tackle today's industry-scale classical...

Masoud Mohseni, Artur Scherer, K. Johnson et al. · 121 citations · ⚡9

Related blog posts

Hugging Face Blog Nov 10, 2026

Decision Models in Hugging Face

We’re on a journey to advance and democratize artificial intelligence through open source and open science.

We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads. See our Cookie Policy.