Skip to content
Conference Open access

Self-Refine Learning in LLM Multi-Agent Systems for Legal Norm Cognition and Compliance

Sep 2026 · Proceedings of the Thirty-Fifth International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence · 0 citations · 72 references

TL;DR

A TBC-TBA self-refine learning multi-agent framework that enables dynamic normative adaptation through iterative multi-agent feedback that integrates Think-Before-Chat (social feedback processing) and Think-Before-Act (norm-guided decision making) phases, allowing agents to progressively refine their normative understanding via structured interaction cycles.

Abstract

As large language models (LLMs) increasingly serve as autonomous agents in social simulations, ensuring their ability to understand and comply with legal norms is essential. Yet, current LLM agents frequently exhibit reward hacking (RH) behaviors by optimizing metrics at the expense of norm adherence, undermining simulation fidelity and limiting deployment. We introduce a TBC-TBA self-refine learning multi-agent framework that enables dynamic normative adaptation through iterative multi-agent feedback. This framework integrates Think-Before-Chat (social feedback processing) and Think-Before-Act (norm-guided decision making) phases, allowing agents to progressively refine their normative understanding via structured interaction cycles. Across five mainstream LLMs and 100 legal scenarios, we found that while LLMs partially recognize legal norms, they systematically exhibit RH behaviors with illegal action rates (IAR) of 14.29–37.11%. Comparison with human cognition reveals alignment in moral reasoning but sharp divergence in risk perception and probability distortion. To address these deficits, we introduce four methods to improve LLM's normative compliance. Dynamic Norm Learning Mechanism (DNLM) serves as the core, using a psychologically grounded identify–infer–implement process that reduces IAR by 15.78% on average and delivers the most significant improvement. We also introduce Deep MaxPain (DMP) for consequence based deterrence, Norm Analysis Chain-of-Thought (NA-CoT) for structured reasoning, and Few-shot Norm Learning (FNL) for case based acquisition, all of them enhance compliance. Our findings show that LLM agents can better follow legal norms when equipped with structured self-refine learning and psychologically informed mechanisms. This work improves social alignment in multi-agent systems and opens avenues for future research on scalable, norm-compliant autonomous agents.The code and data are publicly available on GitHub.

Read PDF

Similar papers

#small language model Book Open access Sep 2026

Evaluating LLM Social Cognition Through Multi-Agentic Strategic Games

Large language models (LLMs) now power the reasoning core of intelligent virtual agents deployed across an expanding range of social settings, from tutoring students and supporting patients in healthcare, to mediating group discussions and representing humans in various social settings. Effective deployment demands soc...

Kevin Kurian, Kevin Scroggins, Emmanuel Dorley et al. · 0 citations
Preprint Aug 2026

TRACE: A Self-Evolving Skill Bank for Consistent, Limit-Aware LLM Agents

Results show that TRACE converts high model potential into stable, consistent performance gain, and bridge the gap between potential and reliable performance to just 4.0 points.

Wen-Hao Wu, Meng-Hao Zhang, X. Wang et al. · 1 citation
2025

Collaborative Reasoner: Self-Improving Social Agents with Synthetic Conversations

This work presents Collaborative Reasoner, a framework to evaluate and improve the collaborative reasoning abilities of language models, and proposes a self-play method to generate synthetic multi-turn preference data and further train the language models to be better collaborators.

Ansong Ni, Ruta Desai, Yang Li et al. · 7 citations
#natural language process... Preprint Aug 2026

Relational Priors as Convergence Pressure in LLM-Based Multi-Agent Systems

It is argued that relational priors should not be a default add-on for LLM-MAS and their safer use is diagnostic and task-specific: compare against a no-prior baseline, monitor correctness-conditioned metrics when truth matters, and omit the relational layer when validation does not justify it.

Ming Shen, Chao Shang, Sadat Shahriar et al. · 0 citations

We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads. See our Cookie Policy.