Oct 2026· Journal of Advances in Biology & Biotechnology
CRISPR and Genetic Engineering
Abstract
Precision plant breeding seeks to link biological target discovery with the development and evaluation of useful alleles in crop improvement. Genome-editing platforms, including CRISPR–Cas nucleases, base editors, prime editors, multiplex editing and cis-regulatory editing, enable targeted genomic alterations; however, their successful use depends on appropriate target choice, editing performance and phenotypic validation. Artificial intelligence (AI) offers complementary approaches for integrating pangenomic, multi-omics, phenotypic and environmental data to prioritise genes and regulatory sequences, predict guide-RNA activity and off-target effects, and support selection across genetic backgrounds and environments. This review examines the potential of combining these methods within a design–build–test–learn framework that connects edit design with molecular verification, high-throughput phenotyping, genomic prediction and conventional breeding operations. Examples discussed include susceptibility-gene and promoter editing for disease resistance, regulatory interventions associated with stress responses, nutritional modification and the emerging application of AI-designed nucleases in rice. Although these advances demonstrate technical feasibility, widespread implementation remains constrained by plant-specific data scarcity, differences among genotypes and environments, transformation and regeneration bottlenecks, complex trait architecture, unintended editing outcomes and regulatory diversity. The review emphasises prospective model validation, causal interpretation, pangenome-aware design, rigorous molecular characterisation and replicated field evaluation. It concludes that AI-guided genome editing can support crop improvement when used alongside quantitative genetics, breeder-defined objectives and responsible governance, rather than as a substitute for empirical breeding evidence.
Some claim that especially in the field of agile software development the research lags years behind of the practice. In this paper, we characterize the status and main challenges for research on agile software development, and propose a preliminary roadmap, focusing on providing more empirical research, primarily on e...
Torgeir Dingsøyr, T. Dybå, P. Abrahamsson· Agile Conference· 92 citations· ⚡7
The results indicate that software developers are a slightly happy population, but the need for limiting the unhappiness of developers remains, and 219 factors representing causes of unhappiness while developing software are identified.
D. Graziotin, Fabian Fagerholm, Xiaofeng Wang et al.· International Conference on...· 84 citations· ⚡6
This study investigates how Lean internal startup facilitates software product innovation in large companies and identifies its enablers and inhibitors, and shows the potential of the method-in-action framework to investigate the Lean startup approach in non-startup context.
Henry Edison, Nina M. Smørsgård, Xiaofeng Wang et al.· Journal of Systems and Softw...· 78 citations· ⚡6
The goal is to not only refine the accuracy of the LLM-based tool but also to underscore its potential in streamlining the software development lifecycle through proactive code improvement and education.
Z. Rasheed, Malik Abdul Sami, Muhammad Waseem et al.· arXiv.org· 62 citations· ⚡3
Agile methods continue to gain popularity. In particular, the Scrum method appears to be on the verge of becoming a de-facto standard in the industry, leading the so called Agile movement. While there are success stories and recommendations, there is little scientifically valid evidence of the challenges in the adoptio...
A. Marchenko, P. Abrahamsson· Agile Conference· 59 citations· ⚡11
A comprehensive overview of how enhanced sampling methods are reshaping the field, with a particular focus on the data-driven construction of collective variables, is provided.
Kai Zhu, Enrico Trizio, Jintu Zhang et al.· Chemical Reviews· 58 citations
Zero-knowledge proofs can verify computing results without rerunning workloads or exposing sensitive data. Magnetar helps bring them into the mainstream with support for standard programming languages, major speed gains, and quantum-resistant security. The post Proof-based general-purpose computing with Magnetar appeared first on Microsoft Research.