OmniMapBench is introduced to foster visual-centric reasoning for document understanding of LVLMs and exhibits higher VDI than established benchmarks, which quantitatively validates its focus on irreducible visual reasoning.
Abstract
Recent advancements in LVLMs necessitate robust benchmarks for complex, visually grounded reasoning. A critical limitation is identified in many document understanding benchmarks: visual content is often reducible to text, enabling high performance without genuine visual grounding. To address this limitation, OmniMapBench is introduced to foster visual-centric reasoning for map documents. The benchmark comprises 2,096 manually annotated question-answer pairs across 1,603 map documents from nine categories. It is designed to probe a hierarchy of skills, ranging from perception to multi-step visual reasoning. To quantify benchmark properties, a simple yet effective benchmark-level metric is proposed: the Visual Dependency Index (VDI), defined as the accuracy drop when images are replaced with question-agnostic descriptions. OmniMapBench exhibits higher VDI than established benchmarks, which quantitatively validates its focus on irreducible visual reasoning. Comprehensive evaluations of 25 leading LVLMs are conducted on OmniMapBench. A significant performance gap is observed, with the top-performing model achieving only 75.03\% accuracy. This result underscores the challenges posed by OmniMapBench to current LVLMs. This work aims to catalyze progress in visual-centric reasoning for document understanding of LVLMs. The dataset and code are publicly available at https://github.com/SIGMME/OmniMapBench.
Evaluation of vision-language models (VLMs) for multimodal mathematical reasoning remains limited for low-resource languages and for geometry problems that require reading a diagram and a question together. We introduce ChitraMiti-12.8k, a synthetic benchmark of 12,874 Bengali planar geometry problems paired with struc...
Khan Raiyan Ibne Reza, Sanjana Aktar Maria, Sumaiya Tabassum Nimi et al.· 0 citations
Recent image generation systems increasingly combine multimodal understanding, reasoning, and synthesis, suggesting that they may do more than render plausible scenes. Yet existing evaluations emphasize aesthetics, prompt alignment, compositionality, or text-based answers, leaving unclear whether these systems can solv...
GraphVerse is introduced, a unified benchmark that jointly evaluates perception, visual reasoning, and text-based graph reasoning in MLLMs under both single-image and paired-image settings and proposes VGR-Score, a process-sensitive metric that evaluates reasoning quality beyond final-answer accuracy.
Yuan-Fu Sun, Yuanhang Ren, Kang Li et al.· 1 citation· ⚡1
SVGEval is introduced, a vision-grounded multimodal benchmark for human-aligned SVG quality assessment that incorporates visual renderings to evaluate whether models can judge the rendered outcome rather than only inspect SVG code, and provides high-quality annotations obtained via multi-round human labeling with exper...
Yimin Wang, Ye Chen, Hanqi Chen et al.· 1 citation
AutoDavis is introduced, a first-of-its-kind automatic and dynamic evaluation protocol that enables on-demand benchmarking of LVLMs across specific capability dimensions and shows effectiveness and reliability, offering a new paradigm for dynamic benchmarking of multimodal intelligence.
Han Bao, Yue Huang, Yan-Bo Wang et al.· Proceedings of the 32nd ACM...· 0 citations
PerceptionBench provides a capability-level standard for measuring and diagnosing the visual perception boundaries of MLLMs, by diagnosing the earliest failure points in the responses of frontier MLLMs across 42 existing benchmarks and constructing an error taxonomy whose perception branch defines ten atomic perceptual...