Skip to content

LatentFlow: A General Framework for Conditioning Stochastic Processes

Jul 2026 · arXiv.org · Vol abs/2607.12922 · 0 citations · 174 references
Mathematics Computer Science

TL;DR

LatentFlow is introduced, a single framework for conditioning stochastic processes, with no learned neural approximations and no training, that enables conditional sampling in seconds on a single desktop CPU across model classes that have never shared a scalable method.

Abstract

Stochastic-process models are, as a rule, far easier to simulate than to condition. Non-linear observations, non-Gaussian likelihoods, black-box information, and global constraints all induce intractable conditional laws, requiring bespoke, model-specific constructions. We introduce LatentFlow, a single framework for conditioning stochastic processes, with no learned neural approximations and no training. Our starting point is to write the stochastic process as the deterministic image of a tractable latent innovation, $f_0 = T_{\vartheta}(\xi_0)$, with $\xi_0$ sampled from a simple reference distribution. This reduces process-level conditioning to latent-space inference: pull the likelihood back through $T_{\vartheta}$, sample the resulting latent law with a tractable guided probability flow, and push the samples forward. This construction is provably exact at the level of the target law; in practice, approximation enters only through finite terminal noising, Monte Carlo guidance, and time discretisation of the continuous-time dynamics, each of which is explicit and systematically reducible. As LatentFlow is training-free, conditioning reduces to solving a single reverse-time SDE. This enables conditional sampling in seconds on a single desktop CPU across model classes that have never shared a scalable method: classical spatial priors, nonlinear stochastic dynamics, mechanistic models from the physical and life sciences, stochastic PDEs, heavy-tails and extremes, point and discrete-state processes, and neural or simulator-defined processes.

View source

Similar papers

Preprint Aug 2026

Exact Rejection Sampling for Non-Gaussian State Space Models

This work constructs a proposal that dominates the target by a known constant, generally unavailable for non-Gaussian state space models, yielding independent exact smoothing draws and an unbiased likelihood estimator whose relative variance is at most $1/p-1$ per draw at acceptance probability $p$.

J. Chan · 0 citations
Preprint Aug 2026

Path-dependent Discrete Amortized Inference

It is demonstrated that the Markovian assumption can both hamper signal propagation during training and catastrophically reduce the learned sampler's expressivity due to state aliasing.

Tiago da Silva, Esmeralda S. Whitammer, S. Lahlou · 0 citations
Preprint Aug 2026

StocBench: A Benchmark for Generative Modeling of Stochastic Dynamics

While stochastic diffusion samplers such as DDPM better preserve the enstrophy spectrum during rollouts in the stochastic setting, deterministic samplers such as DDIM and DPM-2 show better spectral preservation in the deterministic setting.

S. Pfister, Benjamin J. Holzschuh, Nils Thuerey · 2 citations
#machine learning Preprint Sep 2026

Particle GFlowNets: Rethinking Generative Marginalization Models

This work describes an automatic criterion for full-state rejuvenation of the Gibbs sampler, derived from the Gelman-Rubin statistic, which plays a key role in speeding up learning convergence.

Tiago da Silva, Diego Mesquita, S. Lahlou · 0 citations
Preprint Aug 2026

Stochastic Autoregressive Learning

It is shown that stochastic autoregressive learning fundamentally differs from the deterministic theory, and that CoT learning at scale $\varepsilon$ is upper-bounded by base learning at scale $\varepsilon/M^2$, whereas e2e learning at scale $\varepsilon$ is upper-bounded, up to logarithmic factors, by $(M/\varepsilon)...

Ilan Doron-Arad, Idan Mehalel, Elchanan Mossel · 1 citation

We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads. See our Cookie Policy.