Skip to content
Review Open access

Mergers and Acquisitions Pricing Multi-agent Cross-Questioning: Paradigm Evolution and Framework

Jul 2026 · Advances in Economics, Management and Political Sciences · Vol 289, pp. 1-8 · 0 citations

TL;DR

This paper analyzes the internal law of the multi-agent cross-questioning mechanism, and summarizes a set of structured analysis frameworks, to believe that the dynamic inquiry paradigm is conducive to optimizing and reshaping the existing asset valuation benchmark in a complex trading environment.

Abstract

This paper systematically reviews the evolution direction of financial artificial intelligence (AI) from traditional statistical fitting to dynamic confrontation. With the help of functional isolation, evidence-based game theory and parameter correction, this paper analyzes the internal law of the multi-agent cross-questioning mechanism, and summarizes a set of structured analysis frameworks. Relevant studies have shown that compared with a single model, the core purpose of building a specific questioning mechanism using confrontation topology is to get through the logic of transforming unstructured semantic risk into structured valuation parameters, to clearly depict the cross-modal mapping path between the two. This model has significant theoretical feasibility in improving the internal consistency of pricing logic and restraining unreasonable premiums. This paper believes that the dynamic inquiry paradigm is conducive to optimizing and reshaping the existing asset valuation benchmark in a complex trading environment. To truly land the man-machine collaborative pricing system, the core is to focus on how to resolve the technical barriers of reasoning interpretability, privacy protection, collaborative deduction and penetration algorithm audit. Only by achieving substantial breakthroughs in these bottlenecks can the follow-up system construction have a solid foundation.

Read PDF

Similar papers

Review Open access Aug 2026

AI-Based Dynamic Pricing: A Cross Industry Bibliometric Review of Trends, Challenges, and Future Directions

The findings reveal a clear methodological shift from rule-based and econometric approaches toward deep learning, multi-agent reinforcement learning, and simulation-driven decision systems, and show that data-intensive and platform-mediated sectors are becoming increasingly prominent in the development and application...

Dervis Ozay, M. Jahanbakht, Shouyi Wang · 0 citations
Open access 2026

MARIF: A Multi-Agent Regime Intelligence Framework for Adaptive Options Strategy Selection in Indian Derivatives Markets

The proposed Multi-Agent Regime Intelligence Framework is an interpretable, extensible architecture unifying signal domains that are normally treated separately in Indian derivatives literature, rather than a claim of validated trading performance.

Deepanshu Lamba, Neelam Srivastav · 0 citations
#artificial intelligence Review Open access Aug 2026

The Coordination Compression Trap: A Dynamic Model of AI-Enabled Productivity, Verification Debt, and Organisational Resilience in Global Knowledge Firms

Aims: This study develops a dynamic explanation for the gap between task-level artificial intelligence productivity and durable enterprise value. It introduces verification debt, the accumulated stock of unverified assumptions, weak review, concealed dependencies, deferred validation, and capability loss. Study Design:...

Kwan-Hong Tan · 2 citations
Review Open access Sep 2026

Beyond the AI Bubble Analogy: Valuation, Productivity, and Infrastructure in the Generative AI Investment Boom

The article proposes an author-developed monitoring framework based on revenue quality, contribution margin, inference economics, economic obsolescence, utilization, enterprise retention, grid execution, and complementary organizational investment that supports a dual diagnosis of generative artificial intelligence.

Sérgio Matos da Silva · 0 citations
Aug 2026

Generative AI Under Uncertainty: Rethinking Managerial Decision Quality in Strategic Business Environments

This paper advances five theoretical propositions that indicate conditions under which GenAI involvement has the potential to improve or impair the quality of strategic decisions and provides an empirical research agenda to test these propositions.

Nagaraj , Jennifer Ethirajulu , Lai · 0 citations
#artificial intelligence Preprint Sep 2026

Agentic Empirical Asset Pricing: Methodological Foundations

This work evaluates SEADS against five re-implemented baselines on two US equity panels using this standard: no single metric ranks the systems consistently, motivating evaluation on multiple axes at once.

Ying-Jian Pan, Xiao-Wei Ding, Kay Giesecke · 0 citations

We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads. See our Cookie Policy.