Aug 2026· Frontiers in Psychology· Vol 17· 0 citations· 64 references
Medicine
TL;DR
This study contributes to reframing the understanding of uncertainty in GenAI-supported EFL writing and highlights the pedagogical affordances of leveraging multimodal AI as a collaborative, affective scaffold rather than a mere linguistic shortcut.
Abstract
Introduction English as a Foreign Language (EFL) writing is inherently fraught with linguistic uncertainty, which frequently triggers anxiety and stifles learner motivation. While generative AI (GenAI) is increasingly adopted, current research predominantly treats these tools as text-generation shortcuts for final writing products, leaving the cognitive and affective mechanisms of multimodal GenAI as a process-oriented scaffold largely underexplored. Method To bridge this gap, this study investigated the effects of a text-to-image (T2I) AI-supported visual narrative intervention on 78 EFL undergraduates' writing anxiety, motivation, and performance through an 8-week quasi-experiment. Specifically, the intervention required the experimental group to engage in an iterative cycle of text input, image generation, and prompt refinement to construct their drafts, whereas the control group employed traditional text-only drafting. Results and discussion Quantitative results revealed that the experimental group exhibited significantly lower writing anxiety, alongside enhanced situational writing motivation and a modest but significant improvement in writing performance, compared to the control group. Qualitative thematic analysis of retrospective interviews indicated that, during the intervention, the T2I AI transformed linguistic uncertainty from a psychological threat into a gamified exploration, although the durability of this shift beyond the intervention period remains to be established. The immediate, non-judgmental visual feedback functioned as an autonomy-supportive scaffold, driving learners to notice the gap and autonomously engage in lexical risk-taking and syntactic refinement. However, as the intervention bundled visual feedback with AI immediacy and interactivity, the specific contribution of the visual modality warrants further investigation. This study contributes to reframing the understanding of uncertainty in GenAI-supported EFL writing and highlights the pedagogical affordances of leveraging multimodal AI as a collaborative, affective scaffold rather than a mere linguistic shortcut.
Investigating whether first-year university students perceive a loss of authenticity in their writing when assisted by AI finds that students value AI for reducing anxiety and improving grammatical accuracy, yet many express ambivalence about authorship and personal voice.
Manel Mizab· International Journal of Cur...· 0 citations
It is argued that feedback must extend beyond error correction to address communicative effectiveness, design, and intermodal coherence (e.g., image-text alignment) and proposed a research agenda that calls for longitudinal investigation of AI-mediated and multimodal feedback ecologies.
Ana Oskoz, Idoia Elola· Studies in Second Language L...· 0 citations
This study evaluated the pedagogical and affective impact of incorporating artificial intelligence (AI)-generated contextualized stories into dictation activities for secondary English as a Foreign Language (EFL) learners. Traditional dictation exercises often use static, decontextualized texts that lead to learner mon...
Marcos Saltos Mendoza, Eder Intriago Palacios· LATAM Revista Latinoamerican...· 0 citations
Investigating the impact of AI-powered conversational agents on Iranian EFL learners' writing anxiety, active participation, and commitment to language learning indicated that AI-driven conversational agents significantly reduced writing anxiety and enhanced agentic engagement among the learners.
Masoomeh Benshams· Assessment and Practice in E...· 0 citations
The study illustrates how developmentally appropriate, teacher-mediated AI activities may support multimodal literacy participation in primary education and should be interpreted as exploratory evidence of association rather than as causal effects of AI.
Panayiota H. Diakou, C. Angeli· Education sciences· 0 citations
We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads.
See our Cookie Policy.