Radar-Based 3D Human Pose Estimation via Motion-Aware Pose Initialization and Observation-Guided Refinement
Woo-Jin JungChan-Bin LimSeung-Hyun Kong
Oct 2026
Artificial IntelligenceComputer Vision
Abstract
3D Human Pose Estimation (3D HPE) is used in indoor environments, such as smart homes, to analyze human movement and monitor human states. Millimeter-wave (mmWave) radar is suitable for this task because it is robust to lighting variations and does not capture images of human appearance. However, radar observations often provide insufficient information about certain body parts or contain overlapping reflections from multiple body parts, limiting accurate 3D joint localization. To address these limitations, we propose the Initialization-to-Refinement Pose Framework (I2R-Pose), comprising two stages: Motion-Aware Pose Initialization and Observation-Guided Refinement. In the first stage, joint-wise features are learned by incorporating temporal relationships across consecutive radar observations and human skeletal structure to compensate for insufficient joint information and estimate an initial 3D pose sequence. In the second stage, separately extracted radar observation features predict joint-wise positional corrections that refine the initial pose and generate the final pose sequence. The framework supports individual and fused inputs of time-Doppler/time-range (TD/TR) maps and radar point clouds (PCs). To evaluate performance across indoor activities, we construct the Radar Motion and Spatial Information for 3D Human Pose Estimation (RaMoS-Pose) dataset, providing synchronized TD/TR maps, radar PCs, and 3D joint ground truth (GT). Evaluations on RaMoS-Pose and the publicly available MVDoppler-Pose dataset show that I2R-Pose reduces mean per-joint position error (MPJPE) by 39.50% on MVDoppler-Pose and by 15.13% on RaMoS-Pose with fused inputs, compared with the best-performing existing methods evaluated on each dataset.
This publication proposes a definition and a classification of agile software development approaches and analyses ten software development methods that can be characterized as being "agile" against the defined criterion.
P. Abrahamsson, O. Salo, Jussi Ronkainen et al.· arXiv.org· 727 citations· ⚡54
The study shows that agile practices improve both informal and formal communication, but indicates that, in larger development situations involving multiple external stakeholders, a mismatch of adequate communication mechanisms can sometimes even hinder the communication.
M. Pikkarainen, Jukka Haikara, O. Salo et al.· Empirical Software Engineeri...· 401 citations· ⚡48
The results indicate that software engineering work practices are chosen opportunistically, adapted and configured to provide value under the constrains imposed by the startup context.
Nicolò Paternoster, Carmine Giardino, M. Unterkalmsteiner et al.· Information and Software Tec...· 394 citations· ⚡54
The possibility of inferring high-dimensional data inference in a model that consists of a prior and an auxiliary differentiable constraint given some additional information is considered, thereby allowing a range of potential applications in adapting models to new domains and tasks.
Alexandros Graikos, Esmeralda S. Whitammer, N. Jojic et al.· Neural Information Processin...· 316 citations· ⚡15
Known for his clear and elegant writing style, Bertsekas shaped fields from control and optimization to large-scale computation and artificial intelligence.