Multimodal-Conditioned Latent Diffusion Models for Spatiotemporal Brain MRI Forecasting
Antonio ScardaceSilvia IngalaSebastiano BattiatoDaniele Rav\`i
Oct 2026
Artificial IntelligenceComputer Vision
Abstract
Spatiotemporal forecasting of 3D anatomical changes is a critical generative vision challenge for modeling Alzheimer's Disease (AD) progression. While brain MRI forecasting from single-modality data has advanced, other key complementary multimodal biomarkers remain underutilized. In this work, we propose the Multimodal-Conditioned Latent Diffusion Model (MC-LDM), a novel framework for patient-specific brain MRI synthesis. MC-LDM leverages multimodal biomarkers---MRI, tau-PET, Clinical Dementia Rating (CDR), and APOE4---during training, but relies only on baseline MRI, APOE4, and patient metadata at inference, reflecting realistic clinical availability. Our contributions are threefold: (1) a Latent Diffusion Model (LDM) fine-tuned via Low-Rank Adaptation (LoRA) for data-efficient learning; (2) a multimodal conditioning that integrates molecular and clinical signals to model heterogeneous disease trajectories; and (3) auxiliary predictors estimating unobserved multimodal biomarkers from MRI features and patient covariates to condition the diffusion model, removing the need for these assessments at inference. Trained on 1,355 visits from 852 subjects in the Alzheimer's Disease Neuroimaging Initiative (ADNI), MC-LDM reduces average regional volumetric MAE by 18% over the second-best baseline on an independent test set of 664 visits. To our knowledge, MC-LDM represents the first diffusion-based framework to leverage multimodal priors for MRI forecasting. This conceptual advancement enables patient-specific trajectory generation that captures aspects of AD heterogeneity not observable from structural anatomy alone, bridging the gap between rich multimodal supervision and the strict constraints of routine clinical deployment. Code is available at: https://github.com/antonioscardace/MC-LDM.
This publication proposes a definition and a classification of agile software development approaches and analyses ten software development methods that can be characterized as being "agile" against the defined criterion.
P. Abrahamsson, O. Salo, Jussi Ronkainen et al.· arXiv.org· 727 citations· ⚡54
The study shows that agile practices improve both informal and formal communication, but indicates that, in larger development situations involving multiple external stakeholders, a mismatch of adequate communication mechanisms can sometimes even hinder the communication.
M. Pikkarainen, Jukka Haikara, O. Salo et al.· Empirical Software Engineeri...· 401 citations· ⚡48
The results indicate that software engineering work practices are chosen opportunistically, adapted and configured to provide value under the constrains imposed by the startup context.
Nicolò Paternoster, Carmine Giardino, M. Unterkalmsteiner et al.· Information and Software Tec...· 394 citations· ⚡54
The possibility of inferring high-dimensional data inference in a model that consists of a prior and an auxiliary differentiable constraint given some additional information is considered, thereby allowing a range of potential applications in adapting models to new domains and tasks.
Alexandros Graikos, Esmeralda S. Whitammer, N. Jojic et al.· Neural Information Processin...· 316 citations· ⚡15
Known for his clear and elegant writing style, Bertsekas shaped fields from control and optimization to large-scale computation and artificial intelligence.