Skip to content
Open access

Geographic access to triple negative breast cancer clinical trials: are trials located near patients?

Sep 2026 · Breast Cancer Research and Treatment · Vol 219 · 0 citations · 39 references
Medicine

TL;DR

Trial availability was significantly lower in counties with the highest health vulnerability and in rural counties, which were more likely to rely exclusively on federally sponsored trials, and in rural counties, which were more likely to rely exclusively on federally sponsored trials.

Abstract

Geographic proximity to clinical trials is a major barrier to trial participation, but geographic access to trials has not been specifically characterized for triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC). We evaluated the geographic distribution of TNBC treatment trials across U.S. counties and examined associated social and demographic characteristics. All trials registered on ClinicalTrials.gov as of September 30, 2024 (n = 510,397) were queried, and active phase II and III TNBC treatment trials were identified through keyword searches. County-level population estimates from the 2018–2022 U.S. Census Bureau 5-year estimates and county adjacency data were used to evaluate trial availability and geographic access. Trial availability was examined according to sponsorship, rurality, health vulnerability, race and ethnicity, and U.S. region. We identified 108 active TNBC trials, including 58 (54%) for metastatic and 50 (46%) for non-metastatic disease. Overall, 76% of U.S. counties had no TNBC trials, 12% had exclusively federally sponsored trials, 10% had both federally and non-federally sponsored trials, and 2% had only non-federally sponsored trials. Trial availability was significantly lower in counties with the highest health vulnerability and in rural counties, which were more likely to rely exclusively on federally sponsored trials. Counties with predominantly Black, Hispanic, and American Indian and Alaska Native populations were less likely to have TNBC trials than predominantly non-Hispanic White counties. Women in the South were more likely than women in the Northeast to have no TNBC trial available in either their county of residence or a neighboring county. TNBC clinical trials are geographically concentrated across the United States, with substantial disparities in access affecting rural and highly vulnerable counties, counties with predominantly racial and ethnic minority populations, and women living in the South. Federally sponsored trials may play an important role in supporting trial availability in underserved areas. Expanding the geographic distribution of TNBC trials may help improve equitable access to clinical trial participation.

Read PDF

Similar papers

Open access Oct 2026

Vulnerability index impacts distribution of prostate cancer clinical trials in the United States

Prostate cancer trials are disproportionately concentrated in the US, with lower representation in vulnerable areas, and expanding trial access to underserved areas is a crucial step in promoting equitable access to care.

Vitor Abreu de Góes, Benjamin D. Mercier, Yu-Jun Li et al. · 0 citations
Review Open access Oct 2026

Geographic patterns of site participation in randomized oncology trials sponsored by U.S.-based organizations.

134 Background: The geographic source of patient enrollments is integral to the interpretation and generalizability of cancer clinical trial findings. For U.S. patients and policymakers, site location may affect how well findings apply to U.S. populations and care settings. However, comparisons of geographic pa...

J. Unger, Hong Xiao, Michael Leblanc et al. · 0 citations
Open access Oct 2026

Characterizing travel burden in oncology clinical trials: A single-institution analysis.

Overall, minority groups are underrepresented among long-distance enrollees, suggesting that those facing the greatest travel burden may never reach enrollment in the first place and underscore the need for targeted interventions aimed at improving clinical trial accessibility for underserved populations.

N. Duggirala, S. J. Park, Andy Han et al. · 0 citations
Open access Aug 2026

Regional Disparities in Socioeconomic Factors and Advanced-stage Presentation in Melanoma: A National Cancer Database Analysis (2004-2020)

Substantial geographic variation exists in the demographic and socioeconomic profile of patients with melanoma, which may correlate to meaningful differences in stage at diagnosis and, given melanoma’s strongly stage-dependent prognosis, potentially survival outcomes as well.

Lola Fuentes Brock, B. Demirors, Nikhil Godbole et al. · 0 citations
Open access Oct 2026

Geographic disparities and temporal trends in aggressive prostate cancer: a SEER population-based analysis (2004–2022)

Prostate cancer burden may be amplified in rural regions or Appalachia areas, where access to screening and healthcare may be limited. This study examined geographic disparities and temporal trends in aggressive and metastatic prostate cancer across four groups defined by rurality and Appalachian status, while assessin...

Yi-Fei Xu, Ayushi Singh, Eric Li et al. · 0 citations

We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads. See our Cookie Policy.