Skip to content
Open access

Vulnerability index impacts distribution of prostate cancer clinical trials in the United States

Oct 2026 · Frontiers in Oncology · Vol 16 · 0 citations · 48 references
Medicine

TL;DR

Prostate cancer trials are disproportionately concentrated in the US, with lower representation in vulnerable areas, and expanding trial access to underserved areas is a crucial step in promoting equitable access to care.

Abstract

Background Availability of clinical trials for prostate cancer in the US varies greatly by region. County-level analyses are vital to characterize healthcare access, disease burden, and population-level disparities. Methods Utilizing the ClinicalTrials.gov trial database, we collated all interventional prostate cancer trials between June 1, 2019, and June 1, 2025. We compiled data on county characteristics along with Social Vulnerability Index (SVI) designations derived from the CDC, NCI, and the Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry data. A zero-inflated negative binomial regression model was used to evaluate trial availability. Trial characteristics were summarized using descriptive analysis. Results We found 884 eligible trials. Among 3,145 counties, only 631 had at least one clinical trial over the study period. Most trials (51%) included patients with metastatic disease. Sixteen percent of trials investigated curative treatments, while 65% examined palliative interventions. The majority of studies (52.5%) had funding from pharmaceutical companies. There was no significant relationship between trial availability and incidence or mortality rates. Among counties with at least one trial, those with a low SVI had twice as many trials per household when compared to those with high SVI (IRR 2.05, 95% CI 1.54 - 2.74, p<0.001). Counties with no trials were more rural (72.3% vs 22.0%) and had fewer specialist physicians (17.1% vs 69.1%). Conclusion Prostate cancer trials are disproportionately concentrated in the US, with lower representation in vulnerable areas. Expanding trial access to underserved areas is a crucial step in promoting equitable access to care.

Read PDF

Similar papers

Open access Sep 2026

Association of community-level social vulnerability with county-level clinical trial access among ovarian cancer patients.

OBJECTIVES Clinical trials are essential to therapeutic advancement, yet access to trials in ovarian cancer may not be equitably distributed. This study evaluated associations between community-level social vulnerability and county-level availability of interventional ovarian cancer clinical trials in the United States...

Reed M. O'Connor, Jennifer A. Sinnott, Caitlin E. Meade et al. · 0 citations
Open access Sep 2026

Geographic access to triple negative breast cancer clinical trials: are trials located near patients?

Trial availability was significantly lower in counties with the highest health vulnerability and in rural counties, which were more likely to rely exclusively on federally sponsored trials, and in rural counties, which were more likely to rely exclusively on federally sponsored trials.

L. B. Amin, M. Kirkwood, Laura A. Levit et al. · 0 citations
Open access Oct 2026

Geospatial analysis of prostate cancer burden and social vulnerability across the state of Virginia.

242 Background: Geographic disparities in prostate cancer outcomes may reflect underlying differences in social vulnerability and healthcare access. We evaluated the relationship between county-level social vulnerability, insurance coverage, and prostate cancer burden across the state of Virginia. Methods: We...

Alisha Sharma, Miranda Brown, Jackie Knight Wilt et al. · 0 citations
Open access Oct 2026

Association of sociodemographic, geographic, and health factors with survival across randomized cancer trials.

Sociodemographic, geographic, and health factors explained more than half of the prognostic information associated with overall survival across randomized oncology trials, exceeding that attributable to traditional clinical factors.

J. Unger, C. Till, R. Osarogiagbon et al. · 0 citations
Open access Oct 2026

Burden of breast cancer in 29 EEA countries: trends, disparities and public health implications

Abstract Background Breast cancer remains the most commonly diagnosed cancer and a leading cause of cancer-related mortality among women in Europe, with notable variation across countries. Despite advances in detection and treatment, modifiable risk factors continue to influence disease burden. This study aims to asses...

D. Grad, B. Unim · 0 citations

We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads. See our Cookie Policy.