Oct 2026· Frontiers in Oncology· Vol 16· 0 citations· 48 references
Medicine
TL;DR
Prostate cancer trials are disproportionately concentrated in the US, with lower representation in vulnerable areas, and expanding trial access to underserved areas is a crucial step in promoting equitable access to care.
Abstract
Background Availability of clinical trials for prostate cancer in the US varies greatly by region. County-level analyses are vital to characterize healthcare access, disease burden, and population-level disparities. Methods Utilizing the ClinicalTrials.gov trial database, we collated all interventional prostate cancer trials between June 1, 2019, and June 1, 2025. We compiled data on county characteristics along with Social Vulnerability Index (SVI) designations derived from the CDC, NCI, and the Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry data. A zero-inflated negative binomial regression model was used to evaluate trial availability. Trial characteristics were summarized using descriptive analysis. Results We found 884 eligible trials. Among 3,145 counties, only 631 had at least one clinical trial over the study period. Most trials (51%) included patients with metastatic disease. Sixteen percent of trials investigated curative treatments, while 65% examined palliative interventions. The majority of studies (52.5%) had funding from pharmaceutical companies. There was no significant relationship between trial availability and incidence or mortality rates. Among counties with at least one trial, those with a low SVI had twice as many trials per household when compared to those with high SVI (IRR 2.05, 95% CI 1.54 - 2.74, p<0.001). Counties with no trials were more rural (72.3% vs 22.0%) and had fewer specialist physicians (17.1% vs 69.1%). Conclusion Prostate cancer trials are disproportionately concentrated in the US, with lower representation in vulnerable areas. Expanding trial access to underserved areas is a crucial step in promoting equitable access to care.
OBJECTIVES
Clinical trials are essential to therapeutic advancement, yet access to trials in ovarian cancer may not be equitably distributed. This study evaluated associations between community-level social vulnerability and county-level availability of interventional ovarian cancer clinical trials in the United States...
Reed M. O'Connor, Jennifer A. Sinnott, Caitlin E. Meade et al.· Gynecologic Oncology· 0 citations
Trial availability was significantly lower in counties with the highest health vulnerability and in rural counties, which were more likely to rely exclusively on federally sponsored trials, and in rural counties, which were more likely to rely exclusively on federally sponsored trials.
L. B. Amin, M. Kirkwood, Laura A. Levit et al.· Breast Cancer Research and T...· 0 citations
242
Background:
Geographic disparities in prostate cancer outcomes may reflect underlying differences in social vulnerability and healthcare access. We evaluated the relationship between county-level social vulnerability, insurance coverage, and prostate cancer burden across the state of Virginia.
Methods:
We...
Alisha Sharma, Miranda Brown, Jackie Knight Wilt et al.· JCO Oncology Practice· 0 citations
Sociodemographic, geographic, and health factors explained more than half of the prognostic information associated with overall survival across randomized oncology trials, exceeding that attributable to traditional clinical factors.
J. Unger, C. Till, R. Osarogiagbon et al.· JCO Oncology Practice· 0 citations
Abstract Background Breast cancer remains the most commonly diagnosed cancer and a leading cause of cancer-related mortality among women in Europe, with notable variation across countries. Despite advances in detection and treatment, modifiable risk factors continue to influence disease burden. This study aims to asses...
D. Grad, B. Unim· European Journal of Public H...· 0 citations