Skip to content
Review Open access

Artificial intelligence usage habits in radiation oncology: A survey for patients and caregivers

Aug 2026 · Radiation Sciences in Oncology · Vol 1, pp. 79-84 · 0 citations · 16 references

TL;DR

Radiation oncology patients and their caregivers frequently use AI to access health-related information, but they have concerns about reliability, privacy, and the preservation of human-centered care.

Abstract

Objective: We aimed to evaluate the usage patterns, awareness, and trust in artificial intelligence (AI) technologies among radiation oncology patients and their caregivers. Materials and Methods: A total of 83 radiation oncology patients or caregivers were surveyed using a 17-item questionnaire. The survey assessed participant demographics, AI awareness, usage patterns, trust, verification behaviors, and concerns. Statistical analyses were conducted using Chi-square and Fisher’s exact tests. Results: Of 83 participants, 40 (48.2%) were patients and 43 (51.8%) were caregivers. The most common uses of AI were learning about disease (42.1%), treatment options (28.9%), receiving support (16.8%), and appointment-related processes during radiation therapy (12.0%). 82.1% of participants verified AI-generated information by consulting a radiation oncologist. 53.0% of participants expressed concerns about misinformation, 37.3% about the privacy of health data, and 30.1% about reduced human interaction. Higher educational level was significantly associated with AI use (p < 0.001). Conclusions: Radiation oncology patients and their caregivers frequently use AI to access health-related information, but they have concerns about reliability, privacy, and the preservation of human-centered care.

Read PDF

Similar papers

Review Open access Oct 2026

Barriers to and Needs for the Implementation of Artificial Intelligence in Radiation Therapy Planning in Saudi Arabia. A Cross-Sectional Survey

Objectives: To assess radiation oncology physicians' perceptions of artificial intelligence (AI) in radiation therapy planning in Saudi Arabia and identify barriers to and support needs for its implementation.Methods: A cross-sectional online survey was distributed through the Saudi Association of Radiation Oncology em...

Abdulaziz Alshaikh, Ghadah AlQarni, A. Alghamdi et al. · 0 citations
#generative ai Sep 2026

The use of generative AI tools among individuals with cancer and their caregivers: a cross-sectional study of awareness, attitudes, and experiences

While patients and caregivers desire physician-verified tools, oncologists must proactively invite open, non-judgmental discussions about AI usage to clinically verify patients’ findings, mitigate misinformation risks and ensure safe integration into clinical practice.

Rashad Ismayilov, A. Oğuz, Gizem Yilmaz Zenger et al. · 2 citations · ⚡1
Review Open access Oct 2026

ROECSG report: Real‐world implementation patterns and perceptions of artificial intelligence in radiation oncology

Abstract Purpose While international surveys have examined radiation oncology professionals’ attitudes toward artificial intelligence (AI) and documented generally low early utilization, actual implementation patterns and the depth of integration among engaged practitioners remain unclear. This multi‐institutional surv...

James J. Sohn, C. Knill, E. Bossart et al. · 0 citations
Open access 2026

Healthcare in the future: Artificial intelligence

Artificial intelligence (AI) is increasingly transforming healthcare by improving diagnostics, treatment, and organisation, but raises ethical, legal, and social issues. The aim of research was to examine attitudes of Serbian citizens toward the use of AI in healthcare and differences according to sociodemographic char...

Ž. Bantić, A. Milošević-Georgiev · 0 citations
Review Open access Oct 2026

Artificial intelligence in oncology practice: National perspectives on adoption, confidence, and implementation readiness.

712 Background: Artificial intelligence (AI) is gaining attention in oncology care for its potential to improve operational efficiency, reduce administrative burden, and support clinical workflows. However, concerns about governance, safety, workforce readiness, and clinical integration may hinder adoption. To...

Teresa van Oort, Bianca Alvarez, C. Offit et al. · 0 citations
Review Open access Oct 2026

Patients’ attitudes toward artificial intelligence across the cancer care continuum: A mixed-methods study.

428 Background: Artificial intelligence (AI) is increasingly incorporated into healthcare, yet patient perspectives on AI in oncology remain underexplored. Cancer presents an important clinical context, characterized by high stakes, uncertainty, and longitudinal clinician-patient relationships. Understanding pa...

A. Lipitz-Snyderman, S. Chimonas, Jennifer Prey Dawson et al. · 0 citations

We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads. See our Cookie Policy.