Skip to content
Review Open access

Contraceptive effectiveness and safety of ormeloxifene: a systematic review.

Sep 2026 · BMJ Sexual & Reproductive Health · Vol 52 Suppl 2, pp. s13-s22 · 1 citation · 34 references
Medicine

TL;DR

Ormeloxifene shows promise as a moderately effective, safe and user-acceptable contraceptive option among reproductive-age women and support its inclusion in global contraceptive guidelines.

Abstract

Objective

To systematically review the contraceptive safety and effectiveness of ormeloxifene, a non-hormonal selective oestrogen receptor modulator, among reproductive-age women.

Methods

A comprehensive search was performed across MEDLINE, EMBASE, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL) and Google Scholar. No restrictions were applied regarding language, geography or publication year. Eligible studies included interventional and observational designs that evaluated the contraceptive effectiveness and/or safety of ormeloxifene. Two reviewers independently extracted data using a standardised form, assessed the risk of bias for individual studies, and graded the certainty of evidence using design-appropriate tools.

Results

The review included 14 studies on contraceptive use of ormeloxifene and 41 studies assessing its safety in non-contraceptive contexts. Twelve contraceptive studies reported Pearl Indices ranging from 0.48 to 4.2 per 100 woman-years, with failure rates between 0.8% and 10.1%. No serious adverse events such as thromboembolism or hepatotoxicity were reported. Two cases of benign endometrial hyperplasia were reported, and transient reductions in lactation were noted among 5.7% of women at 1 month, decreasing to 2% at 6 months among women using ormeloxifene as contraception. Infant exposure during breastfeeding remained below 10% of the maternal dose. The most common side effects were menstrual irregularities, leading to discontinuation in up to 31.5% of users. Continuation rates were high at 3-6 months (>85-100%), declining to 27-91% in larger cohorts involving longer follow-up extending beyond 12 months. Method satisfaction was consistently high (75-95%). All 14 studies on contraceptive use were conducted in India, had a high risk of bias, and only four were multicentre studies.

Conclusions

Ormeloxifene shows promise as a moderately effective, safe and user-acceptable contraceptive option. The current evidence is limited by methodological weaknesses and geographic concentration. High-quality, large-scale studies in diverse populations are essential to establish ormeloxifene's comparative effectiveness and safety with greater certainty and support its inclusion in global contraceptive guidelines. PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER CRD42024622516.

Read PDF

Similar papers

Meta-analysis Open access Sep 2026

Effectiveness, safety and acceptability of mifepristone compared with other interventions in reproductive-age women using emergency contraception for the prevention of pregnancy: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND Emergency contraception (EC) prevents pregnancy after unprotected sexual intercourse using oral medications or intrauterine devices. Comparative evidence on effectiveness and safety is essential to inform emergency contraceptive counselling. OBJECTIVES To evaluate the effectiveness, safety and acceptabilit...

Shaalini Ramanadhan, Alison Edelman, Yan Che et al. · 1 citation
Review Open access Mar 2026

Exploring Short-Acting Hormonal Contraceptives in Endometriosis Care—A Narrative Review and Evidence-Based Practical Considerations

Background: Endometriosis is a chronic, estrogen-dependent inflammatory condition affecting approximately 10% of women of reproductive age and manifesting with pelvic pain, dysmenorrhea, dyspareunia, fatigue, and infertility. First-line treatment in most patients is hormonal therapy, and among the available options, co...

M. Martínez-Zamora, Josep Perelló-Capó, Joaquim Calaf-Alsina et al. · 0 citations
Meta-analysis Open access Sep 2026

Effectiveness, safety and acceptability of continuous or extended-cycle use of combined oral contraceptives (COCs): a systematic review and meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND To evaluate the contraceptive effectiveness, safety and acceptability of continuous or extended-cycle combined oral contraceptives (COCs) compared with conventional cyclic regimens (21/7 or 24/4). METHODS A systematic search was conducted in Medline, Embase, Web of Science, trials registries and other data...

Li Jiang, Maya Kshatriya, Z. Bhutta et al. · 0 citations
Review Open access Sep 2026

Efficacy, safety and acceptability of the use of 68 mg etonogestrel contraceptive subdermal implant for up to 5 years compared with up to 3 years: a systematic review.

Current evidence, despite its low certainty, does not carry signals of potential concerns with regard to extended use of the etonogestrel implant, with potential for benefit.

Jessica Chen, J. Sothornwit, Asantesana Kamuyango et al. · 1 citation
Review Open access Sep 2026

Comparative efficacy of vitamin B12 supplementation routes in adults with replacement indication: a systematic review

Summary Background Vitamin B12 deficiency is common and often requires long-term supplementation to prevent serious complications, yet the comparative efficacy of the oral, sublingual, and intramuscular routes remains uncertain. This systematic review evaluated the efficacy of different vitamin B12 supplementation rout...

Daniela Debone, André Ferreira Azeredo da Silva, J. T. Cordenonssi et al. · 0 citations
Case report Open access Sep 2026

Efficacy and Safety of the Levonorgestrel-Releasing Intrauterine System Compared With Oral Progestogens for Endometrial Hyperplasia: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials

To compare the efficacy and safety of the levonorgestrel-releasing intrauterine system (LNG-IUS) with oral progestogens for histologic regression of endometrial hyperplasia using randomized controlled trial data. A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials was conducted. The prima...

Xiao-Yan-Fang-Wen-Jing Ye, Li-Yun Liao, Zhi-Xiang Zhou et al. · 0 citations

We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads. See our Cookie Policy.