Skip to content
Review Open access

Reversibility-Aware Staged Delegation for Enterprise Agentic AI: A Real-Options and Resilience Framework for Irreversible Actions

Jul 2026 · Open Access Journal of Multidisciplinary Research · Vol 2, pp. 12-26 · 0 citations

TL;DR

Reversibility-Aware Staged Delegation (RASD), a multidisciplinary decision framework integrating AI governance, resilience engineering, transaction processing, real-options reasoning, and human-centered automation, is developed and the findings support a shift from binary autonomy decisions toward recoverability-preserving execution architectures.

Abstract

Enterprise agentic artificial intelligence (AI) increasingly converts model outputs into consequential actions involving payments, records, customer communications, infrastructure, and regulated decisions. Existing safeguards commonly emphasize refusal, confidence thresholds, expected loss, or human approval, but they insufficiently distinguish a recoverable task failure from an irreversible or externally propagated harm. This paper develops Reversibility-Aware Staged Delegation (RASD), a multidisciplinary decision framework integrating AI governance, resilience engineering, transaction processing, real-options reasoning, and human-centered automation. RASD introduces an Action Recoverability Index, Non-Recoverable Exposure, and an option-value decision rule that allocates each proposed action among direct execution, staged commit, human review, and block/defer modes. The staged mode separates preparation, validation, commitment, and compensation so that an agent can make progress while preserving the organization’s ability to inspect, reverse, or contain side effects. A formal dominance condition shows when staging creates greater expected value than direct execution. The framework is evaluated in a Monte Carlo design comprising 120,000 synthetic enterprise tasks across 240 episodes, including a controlled distribution shift. RASD achieved a mean net value of 7.408 normalized units per task, compared with 5.735 for a confidence-threshold policy and 5.282 for an expected-loss gate. Its severe-incident rate was 0.390%, versus 5.937% and 4.166%, respectively, while preserving positive value after distribution shift. RASD had a higher raw task-failure rate than the expected-loss gate, demonstrating that failure frequency alone is an inadequate safety metric when recovery and consequence containment differ. The findings support a shift from binary autonomy decisions toward recoverability-preserving execution architectures and provide operational guidance for auditability, human escalation, and risk-adjusted enterprise value creation.

Read PDF

Similar papers

2026

Governing Agentic AI in Enterprise Operations: Architectural “Rails” for Safe, Deterministic, and Compliant Autonomous Systems

This paper argues that the introduction of agentic AI requires a substantial expansion of traditional enterprise architecture principles to address new behavioral, security, and governance risks emerging from non-deterministic AI systems interacting with heterogeneous operational platforms-ERP, HCM, CLM, asset manageme...

Elizabeth Koumpan, Vimal Dimpi · 0 citations
Preprint Aug 2026

Authority-Inference Separation in Agentic Finance: First-Line Control, Blockchain Enforcement, and Replayable Assurance

This study develops and evaluates Authority-Inference Separation (AIS), an intent-centered architecture for bounded agentic finance that decides whether a specific intent may act, while blockchain can make granted authority bounded, executable, and independently observable.

Hui Gong, Michail Samawi, Francesca Medda · 1 citation
Preprint Aug 2026

Governing Agentic AI in FinTech

This work develops a multilevel governance theory for agentic AI and test its mechanisms in three studies over nine model versions, from a three-billion-parameter local model to a commercial frontier system.

Henry L. Han · 0 citations
Review Aug 2026

Stateful Governance for Concurrent Agentic Systems

MasuGate is presented, a runtime architecture that keeps policies as reviewable programs while coordinating the state and effects needed to preserve their decisions, and suggests a path for integrating stateful governance boundaries into agent frameworks and provider-backed domains where agents act on shared resources.

Yuxiang Peng, Xiaodi Wu · 1 citation
Review Open access Sep 2026

Governing Agentic AI in Enterprise Workflows: A Bounded-Autonomy Framework for Delegated Authority and Controlled Execution

Agentic AI can interpret information, plan, make workflow decisions, and use enterprise tools. Yet technical capability does not establish authoritative meaning, legitimate process state, organisational permission, or accountable execution. The challenge is to preserve adaptability while ensuring that consequential act...

B. Jørgensen, Z. Ma · 0 citations
#artificial intelligence Preprint Sep 2026

Recoverability as a System Primitive for Long-Horizon AI Agents

AI agents can be interrupted while editing files, calling tools, or carrying out multi-step tasks. Restarting repeats completed work, but continuing from unverified or outdated progress can carry earlier errors forward. A saved state is not necessarily a suitable place to resume. We introduce recoverability as a system...

Zhi-Hui Zhang, Wei Liu · 0 citations

We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads. See our Cookie Policy.