The findings indicate that leadership commitment and strategic alignment are the most consistently cited critical success factors for successful digital transformation and the Comprehensive digital transformation Success Model (CDTSM) is proposed, which integrates these CSFs into a structured framework encompassing the initiation, planning, execution, monitoring, and sustainability phases of digital transformation.
The findings provide an integrated overview of current scientific knowledge and highlight gaps in research across different industries and levels of analysis, suggesting future studies should explore less digitally advanced sectors and include individual, unit, and organizational level perspectives.
Vaida Petrauskaitė-Jocienė, Renata Korsakienė· International Scientific Con...· 1 citation
It is concluded that the success of digital transformation in the public sector is not determined by technology investment alone, but by leadership maturity that integrates strategic vision, organizational agility, and public value simultaneously.
Teuku Riefky Harsya, R. Firmansyah, Tumpal Raines Napitupulu et al.· Greenation International Jou...· 0 citations
An integrated conceptual framework is developed with the help of key findings and propositions that emerged from the selected studies to address specific research questions, find gaps and propose future research agendas.
Koustav Dakshit, Sachin Modgil, Rohan Mukherjee et al.· The TQM Journal· 0 citations
The purpose of this study is to advance knowledge for managers, policymakers, and researchers regarding the important key factors of successful Digital Transformation (DT) adoption, which can shed light on research gaps and help form a research agenda. A systematic literature review was conducted to analyse 26 peer-reviewed journal articles published between 2020 and 2025 from the Scopus, Emerald, Insight, Google Scholar, and ProQuest databases, following the PRISMA guidelines. Four DT adoption models, such as Diffusion of Innovation (DOI), Technology Acceptance Model (TAM), Task-Technology Fit (TTF), and Theory of Planned Behaviour (TPB), have been analysed to understand why people embrace DT either positively or negatively. According to the literature, the success factors for adopting DT have been identified. In addition, it is found that using only one DT adoption model does not ensure success. It is advisable to use an integrated multi-model or multiple frameworks for the theoretical adoption of DT. Using multiple frameworks makes DT adoption easier to understand. The Input-Process Output (IPO) schema allows consolidating the gaps in the present state and setting out the research agenda. The IPO schema can be considered a helpful tool for identifying research gaps and setting the research agenda, as well as for planning, decision-making, and policymaking.
Amando Singun· International Journal of Inn...· 0 citations
A systems-based and process-oriented framework explaining how organizational factors translate into digital readiness in small firms is developed and Project Management Capability is positioned as the critical link between organizational factors and digitally enabled competitive advantage in small firms.
Marina Proença, C. D. dos Santos, A. Toaldo et al.· Systems· 0 citations
Introduction Digital capability (DC) has emerged as a critical construct for understanding how individuals and organizations respond to digital transformation. Despite its growing importance, the literature remains fragmented, with inconsistent definitions, overlapping terminology, and varying levels of analysis across disciplines. This study addresses these issues by synthesizing prior research and positioning DC as a multilevel construct that integrates individual competencies and organizational capabilities. Methods This study employs a Systematic Literature Review (SLR) approach, following the guidelines. Articles were retrieved from the Scopus database, covering the period from 2007 to 2022. From an initial pool of 561 studies, 53 peer-reviewed journal articles in the fields of business and management were selected based on predefined inclusion and exclusion criteria. A directed conceptual coding approach was used to identify and classify the antecedents and consequences of DC. Results The findings indicate that DC remains conceptually underdeveloped and is predominantly examined at the individual level, particularly in relation to digital skills. At the organizational level, the literature emphasizes dimensions such as digital leadership, digital culture, and digital technology capability. The review identifies key antecedents operating across individual, organizational, and environmental levels, while the consequences of DC are associated with a range of operational and organizational outcomes, including innovation, performance, and resilience. However, empirical evidence on multilevel interactions remains limited, and methodological approaches are largely dominated by quantitative designs. Discussion This study contributes to the literature by proposing an integrative, multilevel framework of DC that links its core dimensions, antecedents, and consequences. The findings highlight that DC should be understood as a configurational and context-dependent capability rather than a singular construct. The review also underscores the need for greater conceptual clarity, multilevel empirical research, and broader contextual exploration, particularly in SMEs and developing economies. These insights provide a foundation for future theoretical development and empirical investigation in the field of digital capability.
S. Widianto, Elisabeth Supriharyanti, Z. A. Pirzada et al.· Frontiers in Psychology· 0 citations
We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads.
See our Cookie Policy.
