This study investigates how Environmental, Social, and Governance Uncertainty (ESGU) relates to carbon intensity across 24 economies observed annually from 2003 to 2024, a question situated at the intersection of Sustainable Development Goals 7 and 13. ESG‐related uncertainty has been studied mainly in financial markets, yet whether it shapes aggregate decarbonization outcomes and through which channel has remained largely unexamined. The empirical design combines two‐way fixed‐effects regressions with Driscoll–Kraay standard errors, a formal mediation test based on Sobel statistics and bias‐corrected bootstrap intervals, and a cross‐sectionally augmented ARDL specification that separates long‐run from short‐run dynamics. Carbon intensity, the renewable electricity share, and the ESGU index are compiled from openly accessible databases, and every series is documented at source to support replication. The estimates indicate that sustainability policy uncertainty is associated with carbon intensity primarily through the energy‐transition channel rather than through a direct effect. Higher ESGU coincides with a larger renewable electricity share (
a
= 0.188,
p
< 0.10), and a larger renewable share is in turn associated with lower carbon intensity (
b
= −0.168,
p
< 0.01); the resulting indirect path is statistically robust (Sobel
z
= −3.46,
p
= 0.001; bootstrap 95% CI [−0.048, −0.016]) and accounts for roughly 47% of the total association. Renewable capacity does not significantly moderate the relationship, whereas trade openness does, and the direction of these conditioning effects departs from prior expectations grounded in firm‐level evidence. By moving ESGU analysis from financial markets to economy‐wide decarbonization and by isolating renewable electricity as the operative transmission mechanism, the study reframes regulatory predictability and clean‐energy deployment as complementary rather than competing instruments for SDG 7 and SDG 13.
This study presents the first empirical unification of the Environmental Phillips Curve (EPC) and Tragedy of the Commons (TOC) frameworks in fossil-fuel-dependent Gulf Cooperation Council (GCC) economies. Employing a Cross-Sectional Autoregressive Distributed Lag approach on data from 2000 to 2023, the analysis accou...
Muhammad Saad Ameer, Arsalan Tanveer, M. Israr et al.· Energy & Environment· 0 citations
Rising volatility in energy markets, shifts in ESG expectations, and uncertainty around trade policy can disrupt investment signals and slow progress toward clean energy. In line with SDG 7 (Affordable and Clean Energy) and SDG 13 (Climate Action), this study examines how energy‐related uncertainty, ESG uncertainty,...
Xinping Han, Mohammad Subhan, Busra Agan Celik et al.· Sustainable Development· 0 citations
China's low‐carbon transition depends not only on policy adoption, but also on how distinct instruments govern industrial behavior. Using panel data for 30 provinces from 2004 to 2023, this study examines whether the formal provincial adoption of circular economy, energy conservation, and comprehensive resource uti...
Shadow economy (SE) is an important feature of economic activity, yet excessive informality may undermine environmental sustainability by weakening regulatory compliance. While green energy (GE) is central to climate policy and sustainable development, the relationship between GE, SE, and ecological footprint (EFP)...
Md Salah Uddin, Rashed Jahangir, Muhammad Al Amin et al.· Frontiers in Environmental S...· 0 citations
The Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) represent an indivisible agenda in which interactions among goals—synergies and trade-offs—must be managed. While substantial progress has been made in quantitative modeling and network analysis of SDG interactions, systematic evidence drawn from empirical policy cases remains l...
Yoko Takimoto, N. Kanie, Ya-Tong Yang· Frontiers in Climate· 0 citations
Energy vulnerability (EV) is a key issue in the context of sustainable development, as concerns over the achievement of net‐zero emission targets have grown stronger due to climate change, rising carbon emissions and increasing energy insecurity. The impact of EV on environmental sustainability is explored by analy...
H. Akram, Jinchao Li, M. Asdullah et al.· Sustainable Development· 0 citations
We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads.
See our Cookie Policy.