Skip to content
Review Open access

Review Article: Fibrosis-4 Index in Steatotic Liver Disease-Past, Present and Future.

Oct 2026 · Alimentary Pharmacology and Therapeutics · 0 citations · 62 references
Medicine

TL;DR

In the precision therapy era, FIB-4 remains a scalable front-door test but should not serve as a stand-alone selector for drug eligibility; confirmatory staging is required to identify F2-F3 disease and exclude cirrhosis.

Abstract

Background

Steatotic liver disease (SLD) is highly prevalent, and fibrosis stage is the strongest determinant of liver-related outcomes, hepatocellular carcinoma and mortality. Liver biopsy remains the reference standard for staging, but it is invasive, subject to sampling and observer variability. These limitations have accelerated the use of noninvasive tests (NITs) across various settings.

Aims

This review summarizes the past, present and future of the Fibrosis-4 (FIB-4) index in SLD.

Methods

We reviewed the development of serum-based fibrosis assessment, validation of FIB-4 across SLD subtypes, its incorporation into clinical pathways, real-world performance and potential role in precision therapy and longitudinal risk assessment.

Results

Initially derived in patients with HIV/hepatitis C coinfection using age, aspartate aminotransferase (AST), alanine aminotransferase (ALT), and platelet count, FIB-4 has since been validated across SLD populations. FIB-4 generally provides moderate discrimination for advanced fibrosis and high negative predictive value (NPV) when used with dual thresholds and age-adjusted cutoffs. Modern care pathways operationalize FIB-4 as the first-line triage test, followed by transient elastography or another second line test for indeterminate or elevated results, with specialty referral and selective biopsy reserved for diagnostic uncertainty or discordant testing.

Conclusions

In the precision therapy era, FIB-4 remains a scalable front-door test but should not serve as a stand-alone selector for drug eligibility; confirmatory staging is required to identify F2-F3 disease and exclude cirrhosis. Future directions include trajectory-based monitoring, integration with elastography and multi-analyte biomarkers, and selective layering of genetic risk to refine prognosis in intermediate and high-risk strata.

Read PDF

Similar papers

Review Open access Oct 2026

From Evidence to Implementation: FIB-4-Based Risk Stratification for Advanced Liver Disease in Saudi Primary Care

Metabolic dysfunction-associated steatotic liver disease (MASLD) is increasingly common and poses a growing challenge for health systems, because most affected people are managed outside specialist liver services. The clinically important task is not simply to identify hepatic steatosis, but to find the smaller subgrou...

Y. Alenezi · 0 citations
Review Oct 2026

Normal Alanine Aminotransferase Levels Underestimate the Burden of Steatotic Liver Disease and Fibrosis in US Adults.

BACKGROUND Despite wide use of serum alanine aminotransferase (ALT) in screening and evaluating liver disease, the definition of a normal ALT is controversial. Here, we aimed to determine the prevalence of steatotic liver disease, metabolic dysfunction-associated steatotic liver disease (MASLD), metabolic dysfunction a...

Jad Allam, Paul J. Nietert, Don C. Rockey · 0 citations
Open access Sep 2026

Differential Cancer Risks and Noninvasive Predictors in MASLD, MetALD, and ALD: A Longitudinal Analysis

Background/Aims The recently proposed classification of steatotic liver disease (SLD) comprises metabolic dysfunction-associated steatotic liver disease (MASLD), MASLD with increased alcohol intake (MetALD), and alcohol-related liver disease (ALD). Long-term cancer risk across these phenotypes remains incompletely char...

Hana Park, Ji-Young Lee, J. E. Koo et al. · 0 citations
Review Open access Oct 2026

The evolving role of liver biopsy in chronic liver disease: a pathological and clinical perspective

Liver biopsy has traditionally been regarded as the reference standard for evaluating chronic liver disease because it provides direct tissue-level assessment of necroinflammatory activity, fibrosis, architectural remodeling, and disease-specific patterns of injury. However, its role has changed substantially with the...

Fereshteh Sharbati, Reza Rezaei · 0 citations
Open access Oct 2026

Non-invasive fibrosis tests in Wilson Disease: Insights from the international Wilson Disease Registry and Barcelona Cohort.

INTRODUCTION Non-invasive tests (NITs) accurately detect fibrosis and may reduce the need for liver biopsy (LB). Detection of advanced fibrosis (≥F3) is clinically important for prognosis, but few studies have explored the use of NITs in patients with Wilson Disease (WD). METHODS In this multicentre observational stu...

Frederik Teicher Lauridsen Kirk, Zoe Mariño, U. To et al. · 0 citations

We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads. See our Cookie Policy.