Skip to content
#machine learning Preprint Open access

Distributed Sparse Interventions in Language Models

Maximilian S. Ernst (Max Planck School of Cognition Center for Lifespan Psychology Max Planck Institute for Human Development Machine Learning Group Technische Universit\"at Berlin) Lorenz Linhardt (Machine Learning Group Technische Universit\"at Berlin Berlin Institute for the Foundations of Learning and Data) Aaron Peikert (Center for Lifespan Psychology Max Planck Institute for Human Development) Oliver Eberle (Machine Learning Group Technische Universit\"at Berlin Berlin Institute for the Foundations of Learning and Data)
Oct 2026
Machine Learning

Abstract

Language models can perform a wide range of tasks at various levels of abstraction. They flexibly infer tasks from context, execute multiple tasks simultaneously, and select among competing goals. Understanding and controlling how models represent these tasks is central to aligning them with human objectives. Researchers can change model behaviour in many ways, but model steering, which manipulates intermediate task representations, links representation to behaviour most directly. Current steering methods typically intervene densely and assume linear effects, e.g., shifting every activation along a global direction in the residual stream. Because such interventions change thousands of neurons at once, they leave researchers to separate relevant from irrelevant neurons. We introduce Distributed Sparse Interventions (DSI), which steers models through a sparse set of individual neurons distributed across layers and attention heads. Finding such a set requires accounting for the selected neurons' interactions, even across layers; DSI achieves that by iteratively refining which neurons to intervene on and how strongly. Across 12 tasks and three instruction-tuned models, DSI activates task behaviour by identifying and intervening on fewer than 0.1% of neurons, outperforming dense steering vectors and often matching 10-shot in-context learning. Because DSI identifies explicit sets of neurons, it connects neuron-level computation to changes in latent representations and, ultimately, to desired outputs, allowing us to study how distributed computational components interact to produce steered behaviour. Our results demonstrate that steering can be viewed not only as a linear shift in representation space, but also as a targeted intervention on model computation, realised by adjusting a small set of interacting neurons whose coordinated activity spans multiple layers and contributes to behaviour.

View source

Similar papers

#artificial intelligence Conference Open access Jun 2018

Gibson Env: Real-World Perception for Embodied Agents

This paper investigates developing real-world perception for active agents, proposes Gibson Environment for this purpose, and showcases a set of perceptual tasks learned therein.

F. Xia, Amir Zamir, Zhi-Yang He et al. · 1,069 citations · ⚡112
#machine learning Review Open access Oct 2014

Software development in startup companies: A systematic mapping study

The results indicate that software engineering work practices are chosen opportunistically, adapted and configured to provide value under the constrains imposed by the startup context.

Nicolò Paternoster, Carmine Giardino, M. Unterkalmsteiner et al. · 394 citations · ⚡54

Diffusion models as plug-and-play priors

The possibility of inferring high-dimensional data inference in a model that consists of a prior and an auxiliary differentiable constraint given some additional information is considered, thereby allowing a range of potential applications in adapting models to new domains and tasks.

Alexandros Graikos, Esmeralda S. Whitammer, N. Jojic et al. · 316 citations · ⚡15

Trajectory Balance: Improved Credit Assignment in GFlowNets

It is proved that any global minimizer of the trajectory balance objective can define a policy that samples exactly from the target distribution, and empirically demonstrate the benefits of the trajectories balance objective for GFlowNet convergence, diversity of generated samples, and robustness to long action sequenc...

Esmeralda S. Whitammer, Moksh Jain, Emmanuel Bengio et al. · 302 citations · ⚡60

KTO: Model Alignment as Prospect Theoretic Optimization

This work proposes a HALO that directly maximizes the utility of generations instead of maximizing the log-likelihood of preferences, and suggests that the best loss depends on the inductive biases most appropriate for a given setting, an oft-overlooked consideration.

Kawin Ethayarajh, Winnie Xu, Niklas Muennighoff et al. · 195 citations · ⚡28

Related blog posts

Microsoft Research Blog Nov 3, 2026

Learn the rules: The hacker mindset

Research Manager Mike Walker reflects on a career spanning hacker culture, cybersecurity, and AI, sharing lessons about trust, teamwork, leadership, and why solving difficult problems requires curiosity, judgment, agility—and an understanding of the rules. The post Learn the rules: The hacker mindset appeared first on Microsoft Research.

Google DeepMind Blog Nov 3, 2026

Agentic cheminformatics with Google Antigravity

Learn how Google Antigravity and our Cheminformatics Skills accelerate drug discovery workflows, search compounds, and propose novel rigidified macrocycles.

We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads. See our Cookie Policy.