Skip to content
Review Open access

Artificial intelligence-assisted phenotyping of sepsis: Research progress, clinical challenges, and translational prospects

Feb 2026 · Digital Health · Vol 12 · 0 citations · 113 references
Medicine

TL;DR

This narrative review synthesizes recent advances in AI-assisted sepsis phenotyping, focusing on three persistent research bottlenecks: terminological inconsistency, fragmented integration between prognostic stratification and treatment-response phenotyping, and ambiguous clinical translation pathways.

Abstract

Sepsis remains a leading cause of mortality in intensive care units worldwide, a challenge exacerbated by pathophysiological and clinical heterogeneity that limits the effectiveness of uniform management strategies, motivating the development of phenotype-guided approaches to diagnosis and treatment. Artificial intelligence (AI)-assisted phenotyping can stratify patients with sepsis into distinct subpopulations with differential immune profiles and heterogeneous treatment responses. This narrative review synthesizes recent advances in AI-assisted sepsis phenotyping, focusing on three persistent research bottlenecks: terminological inconsistency, fragmented integration between prognostic stratification and treatment-response phenotyping, and ambiguous clinical translation pathways. A standardized nomenclature is proposed to improve cross-study comparability, accompanied by a delineation of mainstream AI methodological frameworks, critical care datasets, and multilevel validation systems tailored for intensive care unit scenarios. Eight complementary research dimensions are mapped, including transcriptomic endotyping, single-cell profiling, electronic health record-derived clinical phenotyping, dynamic trajectory modeling, organ dysfunction stratification, biomarker panels, multi-omic integration, and treatment-response phenotyping, with treatment-response phenotyping highlighted as the highest-priority translational frontier. Critical analysis of predominant translational barriers, such as limited model generalizability, insufficient interpretability, poor workflow compatibility, and regulatory uncertainty, is presented alongside stage-specific actionable roadmaps designed to promote real-world clinical deployment. By constructing a unified interdisciplinary framework, this review defines key future research priorities to accelerate the evidence-based transition from algorithmic prototypes to bedside precision sepsis management.

Read PDF

Similar papers

Review Open access Aug 2026

Genomic and integrative based progression biomarker discovery in adult sepsis: toward clinical stratification and precision medicine

This review provides a comprehensive overview of molecular biomarker approaches used to predict sepsis course and prognosis in adult patients, covering genetic, transcriptomic, proteomic, and integrative strategies up to May 2026.

S. González-Barbuzano, E. Suárez-Pajés, M. Bardají-Carrillo et al. · 0 citations
Review Open access Jul 2026

Recent advances in screening, diagnosis, prognosis and personalized treatment of sepsis.

Sepsis is a multi-system physiological syndrome defined as a dysregulated host response to infection. Despite recent advances clinicians continue to depend on clinically or physiologically defined syndromes as poor classifiers and therefore fail to accurately predict outcome or responses to treatment. Recent studies su...

Natalie N. Whitfield Jones, Casey M. Clements, Shailee Rasania et al. · 0 citations
Review Open access Aug 2026

Frontiers in the diagnosis and treatment of sepsis-induced cardiomyopathy: current status and prospects

This systematic review outlines the overall research landscape of SIC, including pathological mechanisms, epidemiological profiles, updated diagnostic systems and innovative therapeutic strategies, as well as existing challenges and future research priorities.

Nai-Hong Zhang, Neng Wang, Jia-Wen He et al. · 0 citations
Review Open access Sep 2026

From sepsis biomarker discovery to regulated in vitro diagnostics: evidence, certification status and implementation gaps

Sepsis remains a diagnostic challenge because early clinical manifestations are non-specific and microbiological confirmation often arrives too late to guide first-hour decisions. The 2026 Surviving Sepsis Campaign guidelines reinforce early clinical recognition using validated clinical scores, appropriate diagnostic s...

Erika P. Plata-Menchaca, Enrique Hernández-Jiménez · 0 citations
Review Open access Aug 2026

Quantifying Metabolic Syndrome Severity: Methodological Evolution, Clinical Validation, and Translational Perspectives

This narrative review evaluates the methodological evolution of quantitative severity assessment, focusing on the transition from conventional statistical scoring to advanced machine learning applications.

Jun Ma, Jing Chen, Hao Zhong et al. · 0 citations

We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads. See our Cookie Policy.