EUS-guided drainage for POPFC appears effective, with an acceptable safety profile in expert centers, achieving clinical resolution in the majority of patients, support the use of EUS-guided drainage as a central component in the management of POPFC.
Abstract
Background
AND
Aims
Endoscopic ultrasound (EUS)-guided drainage is increasingly used for the management of postoperative pancreatic fluid collections (POPFC). We aimed to identify factors associated with clinical success, and to perform exploratory analyses of outcomes stratified by surgery type and stent type.
PATIENTS AND
Methods
We performed a retrospective multicenter cohort study including patients who underwent EUS-guided drainage of POPFC following pancreatic surgery between 2014 and August 2024 at three academic centers. The primary outcome was clinical success, defined as combined radiological and clinical resolution without the need for percutaneous or surgical step-up intervention.
Results
A total of 265 patients were included (mean age 64±14 years; 57% male; 52% underwent drainage ≤14 days after surgery, necrotic component in 51%). Clinical success was achieved in 194 patients (73%; 95% CI 67.5-78.1%), including 160 (60%; 95% CI 54.5-66.3%) after a single procedure and 34 after additional endoscopic reinterventions, while 20 patients (7.6%; 95% CI 4.4-10.7%) required percutaneous or surgical step-up. Distal pancreatectomy, compared with pancreaticoduodenectomy, was associated with a higher rate of reintervention (32% vs. 20%, p=0.02) and independently associated with lower odds of clinical success (odds ratio 0.53, 95% confidence interval 0.29-0.98; p=0.04).
Conclusions
EUS-guided drainage for POPFC appears effective, with an acceptable safety profile in expert centers, achieving clinical resolution in the majority of patients. Distal pancreatectomy was associated with a more complex treatment course. These findings support the use of EUS-guided drainage as a central component in the management of POPFC.
BACKGROUND
Endoscopic ultrasound-guided gallbladder drainage (EUS-GBD) and endoscopic transpapillary gallbladder drainage (ET-GBD) are alternatives for high surgical-risk patients with acute cholecystitis (AC). Their comparative efficacy and safety remain uncertain.
METHODS
Studies comparing EUS-GBD and ET-GBD in hig...
Anmol Mohan, Ayan Mohammed Khan, T. Khan et al.· Journal of Gastrointestinal...· 0 citations
After distal pancreatectomy, first-line endoscopic drainage of symptomatic POPF-associated collections was associated with a shorter total hospital stay and a trend toward a higher clinical success rate but may carry a risk of bleeding.
Charlotte Rondé-Roupie, S. Dokmak, Louis Romengas et al.· Surgical Endoscopy· 0 citations
Background/Aims
Although endoscopic ultrasound-guided hepaticogastrostomy (EUS-HGS) has been reported to have favorable outcomes, it is associated with a risk of severe adverse events. Despite the increasing frequency of EUS-HGS use in older patients, its safety and efficacy in this population have not been sufficientl...
Background: Endoscopic Retrograde Cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) Has Largely Supplanted Open Surgical Exploration for Biliary and Pancreatic Ductal Disease, Yet Outcome Data from Tertiary Centre’s in Bangladesh. Objective: This Study Evaluated the Procedural Success Rate, Complication Profile, And Clinical Indication...
Syeda Momena Hossain· TAJ Journal of Teachers Asso...· 0 citations
ABSTRACT Objectives Gallbladder drainage is used for patients with acute cholecystitis (AC) who are unsuitable for emergency cholecystectomy. Percutaneous transhepatic gallbladder drainage (PTGBD), endoscopic ultrasound‐guided gallbladder drainage (EUS‐GBD), and endoscopic transpapillary GBD (ETGBD) are used as bridge‐...
Keiki Nagai, Yuji Fujita, Hiroki Uechi et al.· DEN Open· 0 citations