Skip to content
Open access

Outcome-Specific Performance of HALP, AIMS65, Glasgow–Blatchford, and Rockall Scores in Emergency Department Patients with Acute Upper Gastrointestinal Bleeding: A Retrospective Cohort Study

Oct 2026 · Journal of Clinical Medicine · Vol 15, pp. 8196 · 0 citations · 20 references
Medicine

TL;DR

HALP showed limited discrimination across the evaluated UGIB outcomes, and no statistically significant adjusted association with mortality was observed, which support outcome-specific selection of UGIB risk scores and do not support the use of HALP as a stand-alone risk-stratification tool without external validation.

Abstract

Background/Objectives: The Hemoglobin–Albumin–Lymphocyte–Platelet (HALP) score integrates hematologic, nutritional, immune, and platelet parameters, but its prognostic value in acute upper gastrointestinal bleeding (UGIB) remains uncertain. We compared the performance of HALP with AIMS65, Glasgow–Blatchford Score (GBS), and Rockall scores. Methods: We retrospectively studied consecutive adults with endoscopy-confirmed UGIB presenting to the emergency department from January 2021 through December 2024. Outcomes were in-hospital mortality, packed red blood cell (PRBC) transfusion within 24 h, and composite severe UGIB, defined as ≥2 PRBC units transfused within 24 h or UGIB-related intensive care unit admission. Discrimination was assessed using receiver operating characteristic curves and areas under the curve (AUCs); pairwise comparisons used the correlated-sample DeLong test. Firth-penalized logistic regression assessed the adjusted association between HALP and in-hospital mortality. Results: Of 209 patients, 24 (11.5%) died and 36 (17.2%) had variceal bleeding. For mortality, AUCs were 0.580 for inverse HALP, 0.802 for AIMS65, 0.733 for GBS, and 0.731 for Rockall. For 24-h PRBC transfusion, AUCs were 0.629, 0.642, 0.814, and 0.511, respectively; for severe UGIB, they were 0.622, 0.594, 0.781, and 0.501. No statistically significant adjusted association between HALP and mortality was observed (aOR, 0.91 per 10-point increase; p = 0.571). Conclusions: HALP showed limited discrimination across the evaluated UGIB outcomes, and no statistically significant adjusted association with mortality was observed. AIMS65 had the highest observed AUC point estimate for mortality, although its AUC did not differ significantly from those of GBS or Rockall. GBS had the highest AUCs for PRBC transfusion and severe UGIB. These findings support outcome-specific selection of UGIB risk scores and do not support the use of HALP as a stand-alone risk-stratification tool without external validation.

Read PDF

Similar papers

Open access Oct 2026

Early prognostic assessment of upper gastrointestinal bleeding requiring intensive care: comparison of SOFA and bleeding-specific risk scores.

INTRODUCTION Bleeding-specific risk scores are widely used in upper gastrointestinal bleeding (UGIB) but were primarily developed in non-critically ill populations. We compared the prognostic performance of the Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (SOFA) score with bleeding-specific scores in patients with UGIB requirin...

Ghita Rami, Cherifa Cheurfa, D. Badurdeen et al. · 0 citations
Open access Oct 2026

HALP Score as a Predictor of Six-Month Mortality in Acute Pulmonary Embolism Patients

Aim: This study evaluated the prognostic value of the Haemoglobin, Albumin, Lymphocyte, and Platelet (HALP) score for six-month mortality in acute pulmonary thromboembolism (APTE) and its added value over established risk tools.Materials and Methods: In this retrospective cohort study, 556 patients with APTE confirmed...

Ihsan Topaloglu, Çağrı Atasoy, Gülfem Erdoğdu · 0 citations
Open access Oct 2026

External validation of the HALP score for predicting in-hospital and long-term outcomes in acute heart failure: a retrospective cohort study

The hemoglobin–albumin–lymphocyte–platelet (HALP) score integrates nutritional, inflammatory, and hematologic status and has been proposed as a prognostic marker in acute heart failure (AHF), but external validation is limited. We retrospectively analyzed 197 consecutive patients hospitalized with AHF at a t...

M. Z. Aydın, Mustafa Gök, M. K. Teber et al. · 0 citations
Open access Oct 2026

Prognostic value of scoring systems in geriatric patients receiving warfarin presenting with upper gastrointestinal bleeding

This study compared the performance of the Glasgow-Blatchford Score (GBS), AIMS65, and the pre-endoscopic Rockall score in predicting clinical outcomes in patients aged ≥ 65 years receiving warfarin who presented with upper gastrointestinal bleeding (UGIB). In this multicenter retrospective study, geriatric patients pr...

Tufan Akın Giray, Ramazan Guven, Akkan Avci et al. · 0 citations
Open access Oct 2026

Comparative performance of pre- and post-endoscopic risk scores for outcome prediction in endoscopy-confirmed upper gastrointestinal bleeding in the emergency department

Upper gastrointestinal bleeding (UGIB) requires early risk stratification, but commonly used scores were developed for different clinical moments and endpoints. We compared albumin, international normalized ratio, mental status, systolic blood pressure, age ≥65 years (AIMS65), Glasgow-Blatchford score (GBS), pre-Baylor...

Emre Oner, Niyazi Ilhan, Yaşar Çatal et al. · 0 citations
Open access Sep 2026

The prognostic value of DIC score combined with lactate in patients with cirrhosis complicated by variceal upper gastrointestinal bleeding: a single-center retrospective cohort study

Multidimensional validation demonstrated that this model exhibited superior discrimination, calibration, and net clinical benefit compared with any single score, and thus can be applied for early risk stratification at admission.

Ying-Ying Cui, Bo Liu, N. Geng et al. · 0 citations

We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads. See our Cookie Policy.