Skip to content
#gene editing Review

Seed Morphogenesis: Genetic Architecture, Regulatory Mechanisms, and Breeding Opportunities.

Oct 2026 · Plant Science · pp. 113554 · 0 citations · 292 references
Medicine

TL;DR

This review compiles the genetic architecture, regulatory mechanisms, and breeding strategies for seed morphogenesis in major crops, demonstrating that embryo patterning is highly conserved, while endosperm development and seed coat development are divergent, highlighting the need for species-specific frameworks.

Abstract

Seed morphogenesis determines seed size, shape, tissue organization, and developmental patterning, which influence crop yield and quality. This review compiles the genetic architecture, regulatory mechanisms, and breeding strategies for seed morphogenesis in major crops. Functionally validated genes and QTLs are cataloged with clear inclusion criteria to distinguish direct evidence for the causal gene from candidate genes identified by GWAS and linkage mapping. Developmental and environmental signals converge through hormonal crosstalk and epigenetic control, including Polycomb repressive complex 2 (PRC2) mediated histone modifications, DNA methylation, chromatin remodeling, and non-coding RNAs to shape seed morphogenesis. Six central regulatory modules govern seed morphogenesis: endosperm proliferation and cellularization, seed coat development, embryo patterning, hormonal integration, cell cycle and expansion control, and ncRNAs. Conserved and species-specific pathways are compared across Arabidopsis, cereals, and legumes, demonstrating that embryo patterning (LAFL, WOX, HD-ZIP III) is highly conserved, while endosperm development (MINI3/IKU2, AGL62) and seed coat development (SHP1/SHP2, STK, MYB5) are divergent, highlighting the need for species-specific frameworks. Modern technological advances such as high-throughput phenotyping, multi-omics, and CRISPR/Cas9 enable module-level functional validation. Breeding programs can deploy validated module genes through MAS, GS, and genome editing. Despite these advances, phenotyping, G × E interactions, pleiotropy, and the functional validation gap in underutilized crops remain unresolved. These gaps can be overcome by shifting from single-gene level manipulation to network-level engineering, integrating multi-omics and systems biology to translate module-level discoveries into improved seed morphogenesis.

View source

Similar papers

Review Open access Oct 2026

A cellular view of seed development and germination

Abstract Seeds are fundamental to global food security, yet their encapsulated structure, dense storage compounds, and spatial heterogeneity have created a “hidden box” problem, often restricting research to bulk and tissue approaches that mask cell type–specific regulatory programs. Advances in single-cell and spatial...

Cun-Man He, Lucas Auroux, Mathew G. Lewsey et al. · 0 citations
Review Open access Oct 2026

Epigenetic regulators partition the genome by evolutionary and developmental constraint

Many epigenetic regulators play essential roles in animal development, but precisely how they function across different cell types without clear sequence preferences remains a foundational challenge. Here, we employed single-cell RNA sequencing to survey the mutant phenotypes of 30 essential regulatory pathways across...

Yusuke Kijima, JoAnne Villagrana, Min-Ming Wang et al. · 0 citations
Review Open access Oct 2026

Molecular and environmental regulation of floral development, flowering, and sex differentiation in angiosperms

Floral organ development and sex differentiation are key processes controlling plant reproduction and yield in angiosperms. The ABCDE model explains floral organ identity through the combinatorial action of MADS-box transcription factors; however, additional regulators such as SPL, WOX, NAC, TGA, and AGL6 further refin...

Sabir Iqbal, Komal Tariq, E. Elatafi et al. · 0 citations
Review Open access Sep 2026

De novo Genes in Plants: Origins, Mechanisms, and Functional Implications.

De novo genes originate from previously non-coding genomic regions. They provide an important source of lineage-specific innovation. In plants, these genes may contribute to adaptation, trait diversity and crop evolution. This review summarizes recent progress in plant de novo gene research. It first discusses major ro...

Zhi-Hao Zuo, Ru-Jia Chen, Yue Lu et al. · 0 citations
#gene editing Review Open access Oct 2026

MicroRNA Gatekeepers: Integrating Growth, Development, and Stress Adaptation in Cotton

As the primary cash crop for natural fiber, cotton develops under sophisticated endogenous genetic programs, with biotic and abiotic stresses continuously driving its adaptive evolution. MicroRNAs (miRNAs) are post-transcriptional regulators that modulate gene expression via target mRNA cleavage, translational repressi...

Jia-Rui Li, Xuan Wang, Jia-Wang Qin et al. · 0 citations

Related blog posts

Microsoft Research Blog Nov 5, 2026

Formally verifying agent-written full-stack web apps with PDD Kit

AI agents can generate code at a scale that’s hard for humans to review line-by-line. PDD Kit helps ensure the code is doing what the developer intended by creating formal specifications and testing against them. It converts developer intent into a Verus specification, proves AI-generated code meets it for every input, and uses tests where proofs aren't practical. Developers review intent, not every line. The post Formally verifying agent-written full-stack web apps with PDD Kit appeared first o…

Microsoft Research Blog Oct 29, 2026

Microsoft Research Focus – Edition #97

Host Sowbhagya Suresh shares some of the latest news and cutting-edge research from across Microsoft—from understanding the challenges facing coding agents to uncovering how people use AI at work and improving extended-range weather forecasting. The post Microsoft Research Focus – Edition #97 appeared first on Microsoft Research.

We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads. See our Cookie Policy.