Jul 2026· Golden Ratio of Law and Social Policy Review· Vol 6, pp. 75-85· 0 citations
TL;DR
It is concluded that legal reform is essential to ensure accountability, legal certainty, and patient protection in the era of digital healthcare and proposes the development of integrated and forward looking legal frameworks that align technological innovation with fundamental principles of criminal law.
Abstract
This study aims to examine the construction of criminal liability in cases of medical malpractice involving artificial intelligence and to identify the normative gaps within contemporary health law that hinder effective accountability. It further seeks to formulate a responsive legal framework capable of addressing the challenges posed by the integration of advanced technologies in medical practice. The research employs normative legal methodology using statute and conceptual approaches. The statute approach analyzes existing legal provisions governing healthcare and criminal liability, while the conceptual approach explores doctrinal principles such as fault, negligence, and responsibility in technologically mediated environments. Data are analyzed using a descriptive prescriptive method to both explain current legal conditions and propose normative solutions. The findings reveal that existing legal frameworks remain anthropocentric and are unable to adequately address the distributed nature of responsibility in AI mediated healthcare. The absence of explicit regulations on the use of artificial intelligence creates a normative vacuum, leading to uncertainty in attributing criminal liability among physicians, developers, and healthcare institutions. The study also finds that traditional doctrines such as mens rea and actus reus are increasingly difficult to apply in cases where decision making involves algorithmic systems. As a result, there is a need to reconceptualize criminal responsibility through more adaptive models, including shared responsibility and selective strict liability. This research concludes that legal reform is essential to ensure accountability, legal certainty, and patient protection in the era of digital healthcare. It proposes the development of integrated and forward looking legal frameworks that align technological innovation with fundamental principles of criminal law.
The rapid deployment of artificial intelligence (AI) systems across the European Union (EU) raises profound legal challenges, particularly regarding liability for damage caused by autonomous or semi-autonomous systems. While AI promises significant economic and societal benefits, its increasing autonomy disrupts tradit...
Vedran Kruljac, Suncana Roksandic, Doris Skaramuca· EU and Comparative Law Issue...· 0 citations
The rapid development and integration of Artificial Intelligence (AI) within medical diagnostics present complex legal challenges that cannot be resolved merely by attributing absolute liability to either the physician or the machine. In Indonesia, regulations concerning health, health technology, electronic medical re...
Asep Sapsudin, Hendri Abdul Qohar· Research Horizon· 0 citations
Legal liability of negligence-based medical error is complex. Legislation strives to balance the accountability of the healthcare practitioner whilst ensuring a safe healthcare practice environment. A balance the UAE seeks to achieve through a mandatory two-tier Medical Liability Committee review to confirm Negligence...
Ayman Alhawawsheh, Nusrat N. Khan, A. Almemari· International Journal of Law...· 0 citations
This article examines the attribution of liability when harm arises in the development, provision, and deployment of artificial intelligence (AI) systems, with particular emphasis on civil liability for damages. Through doctrinal analysis, engagement with scholarly arguments, and a comparison between Vietnamese and Eur...
Vinh van Pham· International Journal of Mul...· 0 citations
Artificial Intelligence (AI) has emerged as one of the most transformative technologies of the twenty-first century, significantly influencing legal systems, governance, commerce, healthcare, finance, transportation, and public administration. As AI-powered systems increasingly perform autonomous decision-making, predi...
Research Author· European Journal of Law, Int...· 0 citations
This review addresses the primary ethical principles relevant to AI in medicine - including respect for patient autonomy, beneficence, non-maleficence, and justice - alongside key legal frameworks with respect to liability, data protection, regulatory compliance, and algorithmic transparency.
Sebastian Schleidgen, O. Friedrich· European journal of internal...· 0 citations
We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads.
See our Cookie Policy.