Skip to content

From Tender to Total Depth: Artificial Intelligence and Generative AI Agents Deployed Across Well Construction Planning and Execution

Nov 2026 · Abu Dhabi International Petroleum Exhibition & Conference (ADIPEC)
Drilling and Well Engineering

Abstract

Abstract Well construction projects face data and decision challenges across two distinct phases: pre-well planning and tender preparation, where manual offset analysis limits coverage and introduces bias; and active drilling execution, where non-productive time (NPT) events demand rapid, data-backed decisions. This paper describes an AI-driven platform that serves the full well lifecycle — automating time and risk estimation during tender preparation, and providing real-time generative AI agent support during drilling execution. The platform integrates 13+ AI and machine learning engines applied to Daily Drilling Reports (DDRs) across two workflow phases. For tender and planning: a transformer-based model classifying drilling activities from operational text in English and Spanish; Monte Carlo simulation for probabilistic time forecasting; a genetic algorithm adapted from multiple sequence alignment techniques to predict operational sequences from historical patterns; a Well Risk Index (WRI) for quantitative, data-driven risk scoring; and hierarchical aggregation from section to campaign level, enabling AFE and P&L scenario construction at tender scale. For drilling execution: a suite of generative AI agents that mine offset cases, rank hypotheses, and deliver remediation recommendations for NPT events including stuck pipe and loss circulation; a location-specific Optimum Fishing Time (OFT) model that replaces global cost rules of thumb with field-calibrated economic thresholds; and a generative AI agent that automates end-of-well report generation from DDR data. The platform is actively used by more than 250 engineers with 38% annual growth, supporting assessment of well construction tenders valued at $10-17 billion annually. Well classification time has been reduced from 8 hours to 20 minutes per well; offset coverage has expanded from the 10-20 wells an engineer can manually review to the full available dataset; data preparation effort has been reduced by 56%; risk assessment is 26 times faster than manual evaluation; and a MENA region tender involving 56 well architectures and 158 sections was completed in at least half the previously required time while evaluating all available offset wells. End-of-well report generation has been reduced from four days to two days. Automated technology identification has been estimated to recover approximately $34.7 million in value per year. P10 well time targets — previously aspirational — are now consistently achievable with actionable steps across the Integrated Well Construction (IWC) portfolio. This paper presents a field-validated, multi-component AI architecture structured around three operational phases — winning work, planning wells, and executing well construction programs — that links time estimation, AFE optimization by constructing scenarios, risk quantification, NPT classification, technology identification, local fishing economics, and real-time drilling event support within a single, data-driven ecosystem. Finally, this solution enables engineers to spend their time in high value activities than in manual excel intensive tasks.

View source

Similar papers

#artificial intelligence Conference Open access Jun 2018

Gibson Env: Real-World Perception for Embodied Agents

This paper investigates developing real-world perception for active agents, proposes Gibson Environment for this purpose, and showcases a set of perceptual tasks learned therein.

F. Xia, Amir Zamir, Zhi-Yang He et al. · 1,069 citations · ⚡112
#artificial intelligence Open access May 2023

Evaluating the Performance of Large Language Models on GAOKAO Benchmark

GAOKAO-Bench is introduced, an intuitive benchmark that employs questions from the Chinese GAOKAO examination as test samples, including both subjective and objective questions that contribute a robust evaluation benchmark for future large language models and offers valuable insights into the advantages and limitations...

Xiaotian Zhang, Chun-yan Li, Yi Zong et al. · 216 citations · ⚡17

KTO: Model Alignment as Prospect Theoretic Optimization

This work proposes a HALO that directly maximizes the utility of generations instead of maximizing the log-likelihood of preferences, and suggests that the best loss depends on the inductive biases most appropriate for a given setting, an oft-overlooked consideration.

Kawin Ethayarajh, Winnie Xu, Niklas Muennighoff et al. · 195 citations · ⚡28
#artificial intelligence Open access Jul 2024

Gender, Race, and Intersectional Bias in Resume Screening via Language Model Retrieval

This work investigates the possibilities of using LLMs in a resume screening setting via a document retrieval framework that simulates job candidate selection and finds that the MTEs are biased, significantly favoring White-associated names in 85% of cases and female-associated names in only 11.1% of cases.

Kyra Wilson, Aylin Caliskan · 131 citations · ⚡8
#artificial intelligence Review Nov 2024

How to Build a Quantum Supercomputer: Scaling from Hundreds to Millions of Qubits

This work shows that orders of magnitude enhancement in performance could be obtained by a combination of hardware improvements and tight quantum-HPC integration and introduces high-performance architectures for quantum-probabilistic computing with custom-designed accelerators to tackle today's industry-scale classical...

Masoud Mohseni, Artur Scherer, K. Johnson et al. · 121 citations · ⚡9

Related blog posts

We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads. See our Cookie Policy.