Jul 2026· Ecotoxicology and Environmental Safety· Vol 322, pp.
120555
· 1 citation· 56 references
Medicine
TL;DR
It is demonstrated that the primer pair fwhF2 / fwhR2n, targeting the mitochondrial COI region, provides the most effective amplification of central European groundwater invertebrates, particularly crustaceans.
Abstract
Groundwater is among the planet's most essential natural resources and a crucial part of the global freshwater cycle. It also harbours a specialized aquatic fauna, the stygofauna, which plays a pivotal role in subterranean ecosystem functioning. DNA metabarcoding provides a powerful tool to better uncover the previously largely hidden aquifer communities. It does so by circumventing taxonomic impediments and uncovering cryptic species, simultaneously enabling the assessment of the impacts of pollution and climate change. However, the application of (e)DNA metabarcoding for groundwater metazoans is hindered by two major obstacles: the scarcity of validated primer pairs and the limited taxonomic coverage of reference databases. In this study, we sought to strengthen the molecular toolbox for groundwater biodiversity research by tackling these two challenges. We demonstrate that the primer pair fwhF2 / fwhR2n, targeting the mitochondrial COI region, provides the most effective amplification of central European groundwater invertebrates, particularly crustaceans. In addition, we contributed targeted updates to public databases (for this study assembled in the Groundwater invertebrate Database; GwinD), particularly for 30 Copepoda, five Bathynellacea, and five Ostracoda species. The toolbox was applied in a case study, demonstrating its utility for (e)DNA metabarcoding of central European groundwater communities while highlighting persisting limitations for several non-crustacean groups.
Groundwater invertebrates exhibit a high level of biodiversity, and robust assessments are crucial for the protection of groundwater ecosystems and the preservation of drinking water quality. Molecular approaches are increasingly used to characterize subterranean biodiversity, but it remains unclear to what extent wa...
Hannah Rau, Tobias Hoeschel, H. Hahn et al.· Environmental DNA· 0 citations
Groundwater continues to be managed predominantly as an abiotic resource for human use, a paradigm that overlooks the biological communities responsible for many indispensable ecosystem services and ultimately the integrity of the global water cycle. A shift towards a holistic ecological perspective is therefor...
Jake Thornhill, Nicole E. White, K. Korbel et al.· Freshwater Biology· 0 citations
It is imperative that freshwater fish biodiversity research incorporates diverse components, encompassing taxonomy, phylogeny and function, alongside multifaceted facets, including richness, divergence and regularity. This comprehensive approach is essential to facilitate a more profound comprehension of freshwater eco...
Wei Chen, Chunfang Wang, Shi-Yun Chi et al.· Fishes· 0 citations
Ponds in urban green spaces, including those in private gardens and public areas, are important biodiversity refuges in otherwise ecologically constrained landscapes, and are significant nodes in the UK’s freshwater biome network. These ponds also represent diverse instances of complex ecosystems created and managed by...
Georgia M. Ward, N. Coyle, Giuliana Sinclair et al.· Frontiers in Environmental S...· 0 citations
Environmental DNA (eDNA) is rapidly becoming a valuable tool for conducting biodiversity research, including studies on marine vertebrates, and metabarcoding of eDNA enables the characterization of biological communities. However, methodological variation across workflow stages can influence results, highlighting the n...
L. Afonso, M. Álvarez-González, Francisco Pascoal et al.· Metabarcoding and Metagenomi...· 0 citations
We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads.
See our Cookie Policy.