Skip to content
Open access

Use of Generative AI Tools to Supplement Novice Design Knowledge in Project-Based Learning

Aug 2026 · Proceedings of the Canadian Engineering Education Association (CEEA) · 0 citations

TL;DR

Findings show students are generally comfortable using genAI, they feel they are using it effectively, that it increases their quality of work and efficiency, and feel it enhances their creativity.

Abstract

This research paper describes an initiative to supplement novice design knowledge with generative AI (genAI). Past studies show students feel they don’t have sufficient genAI knowledge and skills, and faculty are concerned about students’ ability to evaluate genAI. Although there is concern that students may become too reliant on genAI, research shows that genAI can support the development of and ultimately automate aspects of the engineering design process. This research identifies students’ perceptions of the use of genAI in engineering design courses. Building on the designer patterns described in Crismond and Adam’s Informed Design Learning and Teaching Matrix, this work explores genAI’s impact on engineering design. Findings show students are generally comfortable using genAI, they feel they are using it effectively, that it increases their quality of work and efficiency, and feel it enhances their creativity. Students reported mixed messages from instructors and concerns about ethical use, unfair advantage, and over-reliance.

Read PDF

Similar papers

Review Open access Aug 2026

Integrating AI into Engineering Design Education: A Comparative Study of Traditional and AI-Enhanced Approaches in a Second-Year Design Course

Investigation of the impact of integrating GenAI tools on student learning in the second-year engineering design course at the University of Prince Edward Island finds that students most frequently used GenAI for brainstorming, problem definition, and concept generation, while strongly engaging with ethical verificatio...

K. Grewal, Mikkayla Ellsworth-Reid, Prabhnoor Sigh et al. · 0 citations
Open access Jul 2026

Student teachers' interactions with generative artificial intelligence in their final thesis projects

The Compensatory model is proposed to describe when genAI becomes integrated into academic writing, which indicates that AI on a general level is used to transform information between different languages, for example, from everyday to academic language.

Karin Stolpe, Sanna Hedrén · 0 citations
Review Open access Sep 2026

IMPACT OF GENAI ON INSTRUCTORS' CREATIVITY AND EFFECTIVENESS IN WRITING INSTRUCTION

Purpose. This study investigates how generative artificial intelligence (GenAI) influences L2 instructors’ perceptions of creativity and effectiveness in lesson planning and material design for writing instruction. It also examines factors motivating continued or discontinued use of GenAI. While participants reported u...

Tetyana Bidna · 0 citations
Book Open access Aug 2026

Unpacking Human–GenAI Collaboration in Software Engineering Education

Generative AI tools such as ChatGPT, Claude, and Gemini are increasingly shaping how students engage with software engineering (SE) problem-solving. However, there is limited understanding of how learners collaborate with GenAI across different stages of the software development lifecycle (SDLC), and how learner agency...

Sonika Pal · 0 citations
Book Open access Aug 2026

A Validated Scale Measuring Student Self-Efficacy for Programming with Generative AI

This paper presents the development and initial validation of an instrument to measure self-efficacy while using GenAI to learn programming, and finds strong support for the validity of the existing Steinhorst instrument in a new context, specifically an introductory programming course that fully integrates GenAI.

J. Prather, Lauren E. Margulieux, Yekaterina Kharitonova et al. · 0 citations
Review Open access Aug 2026

When AI Gets It Wrong: Conscious Competence Development through Student Design Reflections

This research explores the use of a latent Dirichlet allocation model to automatically classify students' design reflections, thereby improving the efficacy of their reviews, and advocates for professional engineering licensure bodies to modernize policies to encourage thoughtful, rigorous evaluation of AI models befor...

Brian Macdonald, Sister Libby Osgood, Christopher Power · 0 citations

We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads. See our Cookie Policy.