Jul 2026· Annual Conference on Innovation and Technology in Computer Science Education· pp. 203-209· 0 citations· 35 references
Computer Science
TL;DR
Strategies for teaching alongside AI tools and future considerations for computing educators and developers to support students' agency, ethical reasoning, and decision-making are discussed.
Abstract
The rapid expansion of artificial intelligence (AI) tools, including generative AI, is reshaping task completion and interaction, leading educational researchers to examine learning opportunities as well as emerging concerns in the present technological landscape. Despite ongoing discussions, it is less clear how students may envision such tools being integrated into computing education. We applied the Technology Acceptance Model and conducted a survey across three tertiary academic institutions in the United States, gathering quantitative and qualitative insights on n = 340 computing students' perspectives. Closed-ended items were examined with descriptive statistics, and an open-ended prompt around AI tool use in computing education was explored through reflexive thematic analysis. We found that 64.1% of students somewhat or strongly agreed that using AI tools (e.g., ChatGPT or GitHub Copilot) made them feel as though they were not truly doing the work themselves. Additionally, 48.8% of students somewhat or strongly agreed that they felt conflicted about using AI tools because competent computing/tech students should be able to figure things out without help. The qualitative themes spoke to instances where students may find adoption beneficial, like ''Expediting and enhancing learning, task completion, and organization,'' or problematic, such as ''Moral concerns and regard for social and environmental impact.'' Based on our results, we discuss strategies for teaching alongside AI tools and future considerations for computing educators and developers to support students' agency, ethical reasoning, and decision-making.
It is suggested that AI technologies have considerable potential to enrich higher education; however, their successful implementation requires careful attention to ethical, technological, and pedagogical considerations to ensure that educational benefits are achieved while minimizing associated risks.
H. U. C. P. Hewawasam, D. Saparamadu· Sabaragamuwa University Jour...· 0 citations
Different disciplinary differences emerged: students in language-focused disciplines exhibited cautious attitudes regarding AI’s influence on authorship and creativity, whereas those in technical sciences generally regarded AI as a neutral assistant with minimal concern for ethical or cognitive implications.
A. Kereibayeva, Fariza Abdraimova, T. Toktarova et al.· AI@DTESI· 0 citations
It is argued that universities should train and encourage students to use ChatGPT, as it is likely to become a common tool in the workplace and the importance of preparing students for a future that embraces AI technologies is highlighted.
A. Talib· INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF SOC...· 0 citations
The study contributes user-derived design requirements that can guide the development of trustworthy and context-appropriate AI-supported learning platforms for undergraduate ICT students in programming-related courses at the two participating universities; broader generalization to other higher education fields requir...
Кazimova Dinara, Turmuratova Dinara, Zatyneyko Anatoly et al.· International Journal of Inf...· 0 citations
Students perceived AI as most beneficial for research and problem-solving activities, while its contribution to critical thinking, coordination, and cooperation was viewed more cautiously, and students considered AI most effective when used as a support tool for clarification, feedback, and verification rather than as...
Danielle Morin· Annals of Social Sciences &a...· 0 citations
The findings show that AI is increasingly seen as a transformative academic tool, especially for research, language learning, writing support and problem‐solving, and despite widespread AI adoption, the study identifies significant gaps in institutional infrastructure and the absence of systematic training programmes.
M. Doğan, B. Kashkhynbay, Zhaniyat Baltabayeva· European Journal of Educatio...· 0 citations
We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads.
See our Cookie Policy.