Jul 2026· World Journal of Advanced Research and Reviews· Vol 31, pp. 523-532· 0 citations
TL;DR
It is suggested that effective governance by 2035 will depend on sustained institutional investment, adaptive regulatory frameworks, technical advances in AI safety, and greater international collaboration, as well as increasing regulatory gaps and societal risks associated with frontier AI systems.
Abstract
Generative artificial intelligence (AI) presents significant governance challenges due to its rapid technological advancement, emergent behavior, and the inability of existing regulatory institutions to keep pace with its development. This paper presents a qualitative, scenario-based forecast of the global regulation of generative AI between 2025 and 2035. Drawing on scenario planning, horizon scanning, and evidence from AI safety research, digital governance theory, and policy analytics, the study identifies two critical uncertainties shaping future regulatory outcomes: the level of international regulatory coordination and the pace of AI safety and interpretability advances. These uncertainties form the basis for two contrasting scenarios: Regulated Convergence, characterized by strengthened international cooperation, consolidated oversight institutions, and augmented governance supported by technical verification mechanisms; and Fragmented Acceleration, in which geopolitical competition, institutional fragmentation, and limited progress in AI safety hinder effective governance. The analysis evaluates the policy trade-offs associated with each scenario, including regulatory capacity, licensing regimes, transparency requirements, international coordination, and open-source AI development. The findings suggest that effective governance by 2035 will depend on sustained institutional investment, adaptive regulatory frameworks, technical advances in AI safety, and greater international collaboration. Without these conditions, fragmented governance is likely to remain the dominant trajectory, increasing regulatory gaps and societal risks associated with frontier AI systems.
It is argued that a layered subsidiarity approach, with specific financing for capacity-building and technical standards that work across the board, is more likely to deliver effective global AI governance than calls for a binding treaty.
Asher Odhiambo Ojuok, Julius Murumba, E. Micheni· East African Journal of Info...· 0 citations
This study aims to identify the key challenges and development prospects of AI implementation to enhance business efficiency and ensure sustainable development, providing strategic guidance for organizations to balance technological innovation with responsibility and risk management.
Giedrius Čyras, Vita Marytė Janušauskienė· International Scientific Con...· 1 citation
The findings suggest that ensuring the ethical use of AI in public administration depends not only on technological solutions but also on digital literacy and the development of a hybrid governance ecosystem that integrates regulatory frameworks, technical auditing mechanisms, and mandatory human oversight (human-in-th...
The study employs a PRISMA-guided systematic literature review of peer-reviewed studies to suggest that AI enhances diplomatic processes by supporting data-driven decision-making, improving negotiation strategies through predictive analytics, and strengthening crisis response capabilities.
Dogan S. Polat, Hakan Aydın· Sustainability· 0 citations
This study aims to identify the key challenges and development prospects of AI implementation to enhance business efficiency and ensure sustainable development, providing strategic guidance for organizations to balance technological innovation with responsibility and risk management.
The paper aims to develop a comprehensive regulatory framework for the use of Artificial Intelligence (AI) in the financial sector. Drawing on the European Union’s Artificial Intelligence Act (EU AIA), the study develops a risk-based proportional approach to AI regulations applicable across financial markets and in...
Habib Ahmed· Journal of Financial Regulat...· 0 citations
We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads.
See our Cookie Policy.