Skip to content

Endoscopist Adherence to Post-polypectomy Surveillance Interval Recommendations Following Removal of 1-4 Non-advanced Adenomas.

Sep 2026 · Clinical Gastroenterology and Hepatology · 0 citations
Medicine

TL;DR

Since the update to post-polypectomy surveillance guidelines in 2020, endoscopist adherence to recommended follow-up intervals for patients with 1-2 NAAs has improved, however, adherence to recommended follow-up intervals remains lower for patients with 1-2 NAA compared to those with 3-4 NAAs.

Abstract

Background

Current post-polypectomy surveillance guidelines (updated in 2020) recommend a 7-10-year surveillance interval for patients with 1-2 non-advanced adenomas (NAAs) and a 3-5-year interval for those with 3-4 NAAs; however, endoscopist adherence to guideline recommendations is unknown. Therefore, we evaluated endoscopist adherence to guideline recommendations and use of interval ranges in a large integrated healthcare system.

Methods

The cross-sectional study was conducted with average-risk adult Kaiser Permanente Northern California patients who underwent a colonoscopy with removal of 1-4 NAAs in 2019-2024. Surveillance intervals were obtained from colonoscopy procedure flowsheets. The proportion of colonoscopies with a guideline adherent surveillance interval and use of interval ranges were calculated annually.

Results

Endoscopist adherence to the 7-10-year interval for patients with 1-2 NAAs improved from 68.1% in 2021 to 71.9% in 2024. In contrast, adherence to the 3-5-year interval for patients with 3-4 NAAs was consistently greater than 90.0%. For both 1-2 and 3-4 NAAs groups, endoscopists predominantly assigned the upper or lower bound of the interval range rather the middle years. In 2021-2024, a 10-year interval was assigned in 45.9% to 47.2% of patients with 1-2 NAAs. A 5-year interval was assigned in 37.6% to 39.5% of patients with 3-4 NAAs.

Conclusion

Since the update to post-polypectomy surveillance guidelines in 2020, endoscopist adherence to recommended follow-up intervals for patients with 1-2 NAAs has improved. However, adherence to recommended follow-up intervals remains lower for patients with 1-2 NAA compared to those with 3-4 NAAs. These disparate adherence rates suggest that the potential for over-surveillance is substantially higher for patients with 1-2 versus 3-4 NAAs.

View source

Similar papers

Open access Sep 2026

Colonoscopy Intervals and Colorectal Cancer Incidence after Adenoma Removal.

BACKGROUND More evidence is needed to inform recommendations for intervals of colonoscopy surveillance after polyp removal. METHODS In this ongoing noninferiority trial conducted in eight European countries, we randomly assigned patients with high-risk adenomas (defined as ≥1 adenoma with a diameter of ≥10 mm, high-g...

R. Jover, M. Bretthauer, Joaquín Cubiella et al. · 0 citations
Open access Sep 2026

Association between index adenomas and advanced neoplasia at third surveillance colonoscopy: Data from the New Hampshire Colonoscopy Registry.

It is suggested that those with an advanced adenomas on index exam continue to have a statistically significant increased risk of advanced neoplasia on 3rd surveillance, and this finding supports close surveillance in patients with these lesions.

Joseph C. Anderson, Obaida F. Dairi, Darius J. Javidi et al. · 0 citations
Open access Oct 2026

Risk of Advanced Colorectal Neoplasia among Patients Undergoing Repeated Colonoscopy Surveillance: A Two-Center Study

Objectives: Postpolypectomy surveillance plays an important role in the prevention of colorectal cancer. However, optimal surveillance intervals for individuals with multiple prior colonoscopies remain unclear. This study aimed to evaluate the association between prior colonoscopy frequency and advanced neoplasia detec...

T. Kawamura, Yasushi Oda, Go Horiguchi et al. · 0 citations
Review Open access Oct 2026

Per-Patient Polyp Detection Rate of Colon Capsule Endoscopy: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis with Exploratory Stratification by Referral Pathway

Background/Objectives: Colon capsule endoscopy (CCE) is a minimally invasive alternative to optical colonoscopy, but per-patient polyp detection rate (PDR), the proportion of patients with at least one visually reported polyp, varies across referral populations. We estimated any-polyp and size-stratified CCE yield and...

I. Lei, Grazia Bernui Vigo, R. Arasaradnam et al. · 0 citations
Open access Sep 2026

Guideline-recommended post-operative intravesical chemotherapy and cystoscopic surveillance among patients with low- and intermediate-risk non-muscle invasive bladder cancer

Introduction We sought to characterize concordance of surveillance and treatment patterns in a large community-based healthcare system with the American Urologic Association/Society of Urologic Oncology (AUA/SUO) guideline for low- and intermediate-risk non-muscle invasive bladder cancer (NMIBC). We expect the results...

M. Shulman, V. Lee, J. Roh et al. · 0 citations
Open access Oct 2026

UK national analysis of colonoscopy quality in inflammatory bowel disease surveillance: a National Endoscopy Database (NED) cohort study.

BACKGROUND Patients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) undergo colonoscopy for diagnosis, disease assessment, and colorectal cancer surveillance. We used the UK National Endoscopy Database (NED) to evaluate the quality of IBD surveillance and identify factors associated with procedural quality. DESIGN All colonosc...

K. Pohl, G. Nigam, Alexandra J. Kent et al. · 0 citations

We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads. See our Cookie Policy.