Aug 2026· American Journal of Science, Engineering and Technology· 0 citations· 15 references
TL;DR
The paper discusses how learning processes in artificial systems are motivated by and differ radically from biological thinking, and compares supervised, unsupervised, and reinforcement learning paradigms, the formation of representations in deep neural networks, and how generative models can produce outputs that seem creative but lack comprehension or intention.
Abstract
Artificial intelligence (AI) systems are often discussed as if they think and learn, and are capable of generating, but these claims are typically presented as metaphors rather than analyses. The development of machine learning and deep learning, particularly neural and generative models, has sparked debate over whether artificial systems truly resemble human cognition in any meaningful way or merely reproduce its features through statistical computation. In this paper, the working principles of modern AI systems are examined by situating machine learning and deep learning within the intellectual traditions of neuroscience and cognitive science. Based on recent surveys, theoretical studies, and critical views, the paper discusses how learning processes in artificial systems are motivated by and differ radically from biological thinking. It compares supervised, unsupervised, and reinforcement learning paradigms, the formation of representations in deep neural networks, and how generative models can produce outputs that seem creative but lack comprehension or intention. The paper critiques neural metaphors, cognitive analogies, and assertions of machine intelligence, arguing that interpreting what AI systems can and cannot do requires careful, specific analysis. Finally, the paper offers an interdisciplinary synthesis that helps clarify the conceptual underpinnings of contemporary AI, where anthropomorphic interpretations are flawed. It underscores the need to synthesize insights from cognitive science, neuroscience, and philosophy.
This chapter presents an accessible yet technically grounded overview of the relationship among AI, ML, and DL, tracing their historical development from early symbolic reasoning and theoretical foundations to modern neural networks and transformer-based systems.
N. Sasikala· International Journal of Com...· 0 citations
It is shown that across a broad class of ANNs trained on diverse tasks, their inference logic can indeed be reformulated as sparse symbolic interactions, and two common mathematical criteria lead to the emergence of such sparse symbolic interactions.
This editorial sets the stage for understanding intelligence as an emergent computational construct, highlighting its role as the first phase in the broader cognitive intelligence systems continuum that progresses toward adaptive, autonomous, and socio-cognitive systems in future research directions.
Tole Sutikno· International Journal of Ele...· 0 citations
This article clarifies the concept definitions and evaluation criteria of understanding in cognitive psychology by combining classic theories and experimental evidence, and uses these criteria as the analytical framework for the performance of “similar understanding” in contemporary artificial intelligence systems.
Ruo Qin· Journal of Language, Culture...· 0 citations
It is posits that, while the number of computational devices is vast, the construction of general AI remains unattainable because it requires defining specific semiotic action spaces for meaningful operations.
P. Saariluoma, Matthias Rauterberg· Discover Artificial Intellig...· 0 citations
It is shown that the vector representations of a variety of neural networks can be closely approximated with symbolic structures, providing a potential way to reconcile longstanding symbolic conceptions of intelligence with the vector-based nature of modern AI.
R. Thomas McCoy, Paul Soulos, Tal Linzen et al.· 1 citation
We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads.
See our Cookie Policy.