Jul 2026· International Journal of Latest Technology in Engineering Management & Applied Science· Vol 15, pp. 2251-2277· 0 citations· 107 references
Abstract
As industrialization expands, modern infrastructure increasingly collides with volatile geological environments, driving a sharp escalation of complex, cascading geohazards. These destructive hazard chains represent a critical global threat to structural and economic resilience. Despite this escalating risk, current early warning systems predominantly rely on fragmented, static methodologies that fail to capture the dynamic reality of temporal hazard evolution. Furthermore, contemporary predictive models are bifurcated between deterministic physical models demanding exhaustive geotechnical parameters and data-driven artificial intelligence algorithms functioning as opaque black boxes devoid of physical interpretability. To resolve these limitations, this review systematically evaluates the modern geohazard landscape through a coupled active-passive conceptual model. This framework systematically evaluates how primary high-energy failures trigger subsequent instability in surrounding geomaterials. The synthesis reveals that integrating space-air-ground multi-scale monitoring including orbital InSAR, UAV photogrammetry, and distributed ground sensors establishes a vital surveillance continuum for early hazard identification. Because these heterogeneous data streams possess significant environmental noise, rigorous multi-source data fusion remains essential to minimize false alarms and resolve spatial discontinuities. Analytically, physically based models provide indispensable mechanical transparency by explicitly simulating material deformation, whereas data-driven ensemble algorithms excel at processing high-dimensional, nonlinear geospatial inputs. Ultimately, transitioning toward proactive, real-time risk reduction demands the integration of physics-informed neural networks (PINNs) that embed geomechanical constraints into computational pipelines. Coupling these hybrid architectures with interactive digital twin technologies will transform static hazard mapping into dynamic virtual environments, empowering engineers to successfully mitigate evolving disaster chains globally.
Geological hazards are frequent and highly destructive, with hydrological factors acting as the primary triggers. Constructing an efficient and precise hydrological monitoring and early warning system is crucial for active hazard prevention and control. Breaking away from the traditional review model based on technolog...
A disaster risk analysis model coupling Geographic Information Systems, ensemble machine learning, and AI-driven interpretation tools, collectively termed GeoAI, to support multi-hazard risk assessment, resilience planning, and citizen-oriented risk communication.
M. Mete, Muhammed Yahya Bıyık, Zeynep Ceyda Karakaya· The International Archives o...· 0 citations
Climate change and increasing socio-environmental pressures are intensifying the occurrence of compound and cascading hazards, highlighting the need for systematic approaches to reconstruct and analyze multi-hazard interactions from historical evidence. However, historical inventories are typically event-based, unevenl...
Marta López-Saavedra, Marc Martínez-Sepúlveda, Joan Martí· Sustainability· 0 citations
Groundwater contamination in chemical industrial parks (CIPs) poses a significant global threat due to complex pollutant compositions, high source intensity, and accidental release risks. Traditional manual monitoring methods often fail to capture transient contamination pulses or incipient leakages, necessitating a tr...
Mo-Ye Luo, Tao Long, Yan Li et al.· Sustainability· 0 citations
Geo-energy infrastructure—comprising oil and gas systems, CCUS, geothermal installations, and subsurface storage—is critical for energy security and low-carbon transitions. Yet disasters and engineering failures can trigger hazardous leaks and contaminant transport through complex geological media, posing cascading ris...
Jing-Han Li· Journal of Geo-Energy and En...· 0 citations
Geological engineering is changing because of climate change, as it changes the environmental boundary conditions that affect the stability of the ground, its security as a resource and the behavior of contaminants. Geological hazards are becoming more complex due to intensifying rainfall, sea-level rise, drought, perm...