AiAuthZ is presented, an authorization gateway that moves the safety decision off the agent's host and prevents a deceived model from acting beyond the verified user's authority on every call routed through it.
Abstract
AI agents issue tool calls on the basis of text they cannot verify, so any party who controls part of the context can forge the appearance of authority. I evaluate 15 contemporary language models against eight attack scenarios derived from a published corpus of real agent incidents and find that refusal varies from 100% down to 38% across fully evaluated models; the most expensive model refused only half of the attacks despite a twentyfold price spread. I present aiAuthZ, an authorization gateway that moves the safety decision off the agent's host. Before a tool call executes, the gateway verifies caller identity with a per-message HMAC-SHA256 signature bound to a single-use nonce and a timestamp window, and it evaluates a role-based and argument-level policy that the agent can neither read nor modify. Every decision joins a SHA-256 hash-chained audit log, and each accepted message yields an HMAC-authenticated QR receipt that achieves 94% mean verification across eight transmission channels, with zero forgeries accepted in 25 wrong-key trials. With the gateway in place, residual attack success falls to 0% for all 15 models at no more than 0.03 ms of added decision latency. On the AgentDojo banking suite, aiAuthZ blocks all seven attacker-directed tool calls the evaluated agents emit, at the cost of one legitimate first-time payment, while a spotlighting baseline allows two injections to succeed. Across nine in-scope case studies from the same incident corpus, aiAuthZ blocks nine of nine, against four of nine for a policy baseline without identity binding. The gateway does not prevent a model from being deceived; it prevents a deceived model from acting beyond the verified user's authority on every call routed through it. The implementation and all experiments are released at https://github.com/Sports-Vision-Inc/aiAuthZ.
This paper evaluated Niyam-AI on 2,000 real-world agent scenarios from Agent-SafetyBench and compared it against three existing safety approaches: NeMo Guardrails, Meta's Llama Prompt Guard 2, and OpenAI's GPT-OSS-Safeguard.
Autonomous LLM agents can turn untrusted content into effectful actions such as payments and permission changes. If the same process interprets this content and controls a reusable signing credential, prompt injection can cross the judgment boundary and reach execution authority. We present KITA, a review-to-authorizat...
A-VIP (AP2 Verified-Intent Protection), a protocol-layer defense that treats the signed intent as a capability grant rather than judging the merchant's description, is introduced, to address this attack vector.
Yedidel Louck, Amit Dvir, Ariel Stulman· 0 citations
NiyamAI is presented, an intent bound runtime guardrail architecture providing cryptographically verifiable execution integrity for autonomous agents and subjects its own enforcement mechanism to 18 adversarial vectors across six classes, disclosing two implementation vulnerabilities identified and remediated during de...
Aditya Katkar, Om Karkele, Kartik Mandhane et al.· 1 citation
NovaFabric is presented, producing audit-grade execution evidence: provider-neutral, tamper-evident, replayable, shareable and conditional on a stated trusted computing base.
It is argued that agent security must be evaluated under an untrusted-model assumption: a correct system is one in which a fully prompt-injected agent still cannot exceed the authority explicitly delegated to it, and an authorization broker is implemented that closes the gap.
Panduranga Sai Varma Dantuluri, Jyotirmoy Sundi· 0 citations
We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads.
See our Cookie Policy.