Skip to content

SCOPE: Synthetic Conditional Objectives for Policy Evolution in Black-Box Combinatorial Optimization

Jul 2026 · arXiv.org · Vol abs/2607.27630 · 0 citations · 63 references
Computer Science

TL;DR

SCOPE reframes objective design as a mechanism for guiding policy exploration, enabling the search process to exploit observed evidence while maintaining structured diversity across discrete solution spaces and generalizes well across diverse combinatorial structures.

Abstract

Black-box combinatorial optimization requires systematically identifying high-quality solutions under a limited evaluation budget, yet the unknown objective function provides little guidance for deciding where the search should explore next. We introduce SCOPE, a general framework for Synthetic Conditional Objectives for Policy Evolution in Black-Box Combinatorial Optimization. Rather than directly optimizing the inaccessible objective, SCOPE learns a set of synthetic objectives conditioned on the accumulated search history, where each objective is designed to expose a distinct and potentially useful preference over candidate solutions. These objectives are then used to evolve search policies that generate diverse candidates, whose true quality is subsequently assessed through black-box evaluations. The outer loop adaptively updates and selects synthetic objectives according to how effectively their induced policies discover promising regions. In contrast, the inner loop returns a portfolio of top-performing policies to reduce the risk of relying on a single surrogate preference. This formulation reframes objective design as a mechanism for guiding policy exploration, enabling the search process to exploit observed evidence while maintaining structured diversity across discrete solution spaces. Extensive experiments across multiple benchmark problems demonstrate that SCOPE consistently improves black-box search performance under limited evaluation budgets and generalizes well across diverse combinatorial structures.

View source

Similar papers

#artificial intelligence Preprint Sep 2026

MOAE: Multi-Objective Agent Evolution with Pareto-Preserving Search

Multi-Objective Agent Evolution (MOAE) is introduced, which organizes iterative in-context refinement as a Pareto-preserving evolutionary search over complete agent rollouts and consistently improves task performance and trajectory quality while maintaining strong safety under matched rollout budgets.

Heng-Le Jiang, Qi-Jun Cai, Zi-Ying Luo et al. · 0 citations
Preprint Aug 2026

Exploit More, Explore Smarter for Budget-Constrained Agentic Search

This work introduces ExTS, a tree-search policy that treats expansion itself as a value-of-information decision, and introduces pilot-run diagnostics that characterize what makes budget-constrained agentic search problems structurally different from one another, providing both understanding of the problem space and pra...

Haoyang Fang, Bernie Wang · 2 citations
#artificial intelligence Preprint Sep 2026

Why Sample What You Can Enumerate? Exact Policy Optimization for Genomic Tool Selection

Reinforcement learning over a frozen reasoner has become a common recipe for teaching a policy which external tools to invoke. We show that this recipe becomes structurally mismatched in specialist scientific settings where the complete tool-subset space is enumerable. There, a small set of recurring computational capa...

Hao-Yue Liu, Xiao-Yu Ma, Ye-Heng Chen et al. · 0 citations
Book Open access Aug 2026

LOGIC: Learning Optimal Goals with an Integrated Critic for Generative Auto-Bidding

LOGIC transforms the exploration paradigm: instead of exploring at the action level, it employs an integrated critic to guide a generator in discovering optimal, high-value goals (RTGs), enabling robust exploration beyond the dataset's frontier while avoiding the fragility of complex multi-loss objectives.

Shi-Hao Shu, Rujie Zhong, Hao Wang et al. · 0 citations
Preprint Aug 2026

Rethinking Self-Evolving Agents: Do We Still Need Prescribed Optimization Pipelines?

This work introduces Open-Ended Optimization (OEO), which keeps the objective, permitted interactions, resource budget, data boundary, and evaluation fixed while allowing the optimizer to compose the improvement process online.

Xue Hui, Fan Yang · 3 citations

We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads. See our Cookie Policy.