FacEDiT: Talking Head Video Editing via Facial Motion Infilling
Kim Sung-BinJoohyun ChangDavid HarwathTae-Hyun Oh
Nov 2026
Artificial IntelligenceComputer Vision
Abstract
Editing a local segment of a talking head video without reshooting the scene remains challenging and underexplored. Local edits, such as insertion, deletion, or substitution, require synthesizing a replacement segment while leaving the rest of the video unchanged. This involves variable-duration local rewriting while preserving identity, unedited regions, and boundary continuity, which standard speech-driven generation and lip synchronization methods do not directly address. Moreover, direct supervision is impractical, as it would require paired videos of the same person and scene that differ only in a local spoken segment. We instead formulate talking head video editing as facial motion infilling, a self-supervised pretext task that recovers masked facial motion from speech and surrounding motion context using ordinary video--speech pairs. Our key insight is that local video editing can be simulated during training by masking a motion span and reconstructing it from speech and visible motion context. Building on this formulation, we introduce FacEDiT, a mask-controlled talking head model with a local temporal attention bias and temporal smoothness regularization to improve lip--speech alignment and transition continuity. We also introduce FacEDiTBench, the first benchmark for talking head video editing, covering diverse edit types and lengths with dedicated evaluation metrics. Extensive experiments show that FacEDiT produces accurate, speech-aligned edits with strong identity preservation and seamless boundary transitions. Beyond editing, the same facial motion infilling model extends to portrait animation and lip synchronization by simply changing the mask pattern, establishing FacEDiT as a unified framework for talking head video editing and generation.
This paper investigates developing real-world perception for active agents, proposes Gibson Environment for this purpose, and showcases a set of perceptual tasks learned therein.
F. Xia, Amir Zamir, Zhi-Yang He et al.· 2018 IEEE/CVF Conference on...· 1,069 citations· ⚡112
This publication proposes a definition and a classification of agile software development approaches and analyses ten software development methods that can be characterized as being "agile" against the defined criterion.
P. Abrahamsson, O. Salo, Jussi Ronkainen et al.· arXiv.org· 727 citations· ⚡54
The study shows that agile practices improve both informal and formal communication, but indicates that, in larger development situations involving multiple external stakeholders, a mismatch of adequate communication mechanisms can sometimes even hinder the communication.
M. Pikkarainen, Jukka Haikara, O. Salo et al.· Empirical Software Engineeri...· 401 citations· ⚡48
The results indicate that software engineering work practices are chosen opportunistically, adapted and configured to provide value under the constrains imposed by the startup context.
Nicolò Paternoster, Carmine Giardino, M. Unterkalmsteiner et al.· Information and Software Tec...· 394 citations· ⚡54
The possibility of inferring high-dimensional data inference in a model that consists of a prior and an auxiliary differentiable constraint given some additional information is considered, thereby allowing a range of potential applications in adapting models to new domains and tasks.
Alexandros Graikos, Esmeralda S. Whitammer, N. Jojic et al.· Neural Information Processin...· 316 citations· ⚡15
Known for his clear and elegant writing style, Bertsekas shaped fields from control and optimization to large-scale computation and artificial intelligence.