VREgo trains manipulation policies from demonstrations recorded on consumer VR headsets with EgoKit with EgoKit on one such headset, the PICO 4 Ultra, and adapts HumanEgo's preprocessing to estimate grasp thresholds per recording, update object positions after release, and propagate segmentation masks between keyframes.
Abstract
VREgo trains manipulation policies from demonstrations recorded on consumer VR headsets; we instantiate it with EgoKit on one such headset, the PICO 4 Ultra. On-device head and hand tracking and stereo object localisation allow the operator to begin a demonstration at the table. We adapt HumanEgo's preprocessing to estimate grasp thresholds per recording, update object positions after release, and propagate segmentation masks between keyframes. We evaluate policies in simulation on two tabletop tasks recorded by one operator. For cube placement, we compare PICO and Project Aria recordings of the same 41 layouts. With 40 training demonstrations, the PICO policies placed the cube on the tray in 67, 74, and 60 of 100 evaluation layouts across three training seeds. The corresponding Aria results were 73, 78, and 0. For a two-stage stacking task recorded with the PICO alone, the baseline placed the block on the tray in 94 of 100 layouts and met the end-of-episode criterion for both placements in two. In one diagnostic episode, repeated replanning deferred release beyond the eight executed steps. Demonstration replays also showed that the open gripper could displace the cube before grasping it. After adapting the training trajectories and adding task-specific execution rules that use simulator object positions, the system met both placement criteria in 93.8% of episodes across four evaluation noise seeds. The same 100 layouts informed rule development and evaluation. VREgo is available at https://vrego.chuange.org/.
This paper investigates developing real-world perception for active agents, proposes Gibson Environment for this purpose, and showcases a set of perceptual tasks learned therein.
F. Xia, Amir Zamir, Zhi-Yang He et al.· 2018 IEEE/CVF Conference on...· 1,069 citations· ⚡112
This publication proposes a definition and a classification of agile software development approaches and analyses ten software development methods that can be characterized as being "agile" against the defined criterion.
P. Abrahamsson, O. Salo, Jussi Ronkainen et al.· arXiv.org· 727 citations· ⚡54
The study shows that agile practices improve both informal and formal communication, but indicates that, in larger development situations involving multiple external stakeholders, a mismatch of adequate communication mechanisms can sometimes even hinder the communication.
M. Pikkarainen, Jukka Haikara, O. Salo et al.· Empirical Software Engineeri...· 401 citations· ⚡48
The results indicate that software engineering work practices are chosen opportunistically, adapted and configured to provide value under the constrains imposed by the startup context.
Nicolò Paternoster, Carmine Giardino, M. Unterkalmsteiner et al.· Information and Software Tec...· 394 citations· ⚡54
AI agents can generate code at a scale that’s hard for humans to review line-by-line. PDD Kit helps ensure the code is doing what the developer intended by creating formal specifications and testing against them. It converts developer intent into a Verus specification, proves AI-generated code meets it for every input, and uses tests where proofs aren't practical. Developers review intent, not every line. The post Formally verifying agent-written full-stack web apps with PDD Kit appeared first o…
MIT News · Artificial Intelligence· news.mit.eduNov 5, 2026
A new system identifies and corrects unreliable object descriptions stored in a robot’s memory, improving the robot’s ability to interact with its environment.