Oct 2026· Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America· Vol 123 44, pp.
e2529474123
· 0 citations· 51 references
Medicine
TL;DR
Findings provide a rationale for the development of CDK16-18 inhibitors-likely targeting multiple subfamily members due to their structural similarity-as a strategy against aggressive cancers, such as hepatocellular carcinoma, where effective treatment options remain limited.
Abstract
The atypical cyclin-dependent kinase subfamily (CDK14-18) encompasses five related proteins with unclear function, and for which individual depletion has not demonstrated sustained therapeutic relevance. We report here that CDK16 and CDK18 compensate each other and liver cancer cells are sensitive to the concomitant inactivation of both kinases, resulting in persistent defects in DNA repair and subsequent cell death. These effects are linked to a role of CDK16/18 in regulating nucleocytoplasmatic transport through phosphorylation of nuclear pore complex components, including NUP35. Genetic ablation of Cdk16 and Cdk18 in established liver tumors driven by MYC and beta-catenin oncogenes triggers DNA damage in cancer cells without affecting adjacent normal tissue, ultimately leading to tumor regression. Collectively, these findings provide a rationale for the development of CDK16-18 inhibitors-likely targeting multiple subfamily members due to their structural similarity-as a strategy against aggressive cancers, such as hepatocellular carcinoma, where effective treatment options remain limited.
Cyclin-dependent kinase inhibitor 3 (CDKN3), also known as kinase-associated phosphatase (KAP), dephosphorylates activating cyclin-dependent kinase 2 (CDK2) Thr160, yet high expression is associated with aggressive features in some cancers. This review distinguishes messenger RNA (mRNA) expression, protein abundance, p...
Yi Li, Long Cheng, Xiao-Wei Zhang et al.· Frontiers in Oncology· 0 citations
A strategy to identify novel CDK4 inhibitors targeting the CDK4-Cyclin D1 protein-protein interaction, a key determinant of CDK4 activation, and diophenic emerged as the lead candidate, demonstrating consistent antiproliferative activity across multiple GBM and epithelial cancer models.
M. Fuentes-Baile, J. A. Encinar, Salomé Araujo-Abad et al.· bioRxiv· 0 citations
Gastroesophageal adenocarcinoma (GEAC) remains a highly aggressive malignancy with limited effective targeted therapies. Cyclin-dependent kinase 9 (CDK9), a key regulator of transcriptional elongation, has been implicated in oncogenic processes across multiple cancer types; however, its functional role and therapeutic...
Y. Zhang, Mikel Ghelfi, Yu Xue et al.· Cancer Letters· 0 citations
Cyclin E1 (CCNE1), a pivotal member of the cyclin family, governs the G1/S phase transition of the cell cycle by binding to and activating cyclin‐dependent kinase 2 (CDK2), thereby initiating DNA replication and driving S‐phase entry. In a broad spectrum of human malignancies—including breast, ovarian, gastric, and non...
Li-Rui Yan, Si-Yi Liu, Yan-Ling Li et al.· Cancer Medicine· 0 citations
Breast cancer has become the most prevalent malignancy worldwide. A key clinical advance has been the introduction of cyclin-dependent kinase 4/6 inhibitors (CDK4/6i), that in combination with endocrine therapy has been a major advance for the treatment of luminal (ER⁺/HER2⁻) breast cancer. CDK4/6i induce cell cycle ar...
P. Carpintero-Fernández, Marta Barturen-Gómez, Vanesa Alvarez et al.· bioRxiv· 0 citations
The potential of CDK9 inhibition in bone metastases is explored, including effects on both tumor cell survival and RANKL-NF-κB -driven osteoclastogenic bone microenvironment, and how CDK12 and CDK13 may provide complementary or context-dependent therapeutic opportunities are discussed.
T. Kähkönen, Gergana Galabova, M. Thormann et al.· Frontiers in Oncology· 0 citations
We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads.
See our Cookie Policy.