Jul 2026· International Conference on Data Technologies and Applications· Vol 11, pp. 180· 0 citations· 42 references
Computer Science
TL;DR
This review establishes AI agent workflow orchestration as a distinct analytical category within materials discovery and identifies the reporting, validation, and reproducibility conditions required for these systems to function as credible scientific infrastructure rather than as conversational demonstrations.
Abstract
Artificial intelligence (AI) agents and large language model (LLM) agents are beginning to move materials discovery beyond isolated prediction tasks and toward tool-grounded workflows that can retrieve prior knowledge, configure simulations, launch calculations, inspect outputs, and decide what to do next. However, adjacent reviews on materials informatics, self-driving laboratories, natural-language processing in materials science, and autonomous chemistry have not isolated simulation-driven materials workflows as a distinct evidence base. This review addresses that gap through PRISMA-guided searches in Scopus (8 May 2026) and Web of Science (15 June 2026) for English-language journal articles published between 2022 and 2026. The combined search returned 232 records; 27 full texts were assessed and 26 studies were included in the final qualitative synthesis after one full-text exclusion. No eligible study was published in 2022 or 2023, indicating that the field emerged only in 2024 and expanded rapidly in 2025–2026. Catalysis and adsorption tasks (n = 6) and alloy design or evaluation (n = 5) dominated the corpus, while specialized multi-agent architectures were the most common pattern (n = 13). Across the included studies, agentic reasoning was most often coupled to workflow orchestration or integration tools, molecular-dynamics or atomistic simulation environments, and materials-data or machine learning screening pipelines; public repositories or archival artifacts were reported in 18 of 26 studies, experimental validation in six, and robotic closed-loop execution in only one study. The strongest evidence came from workflows that grounded language model decisions in simulators, structured databases, or experimentally verifiable outputs rather than in free-form text alone. This review therefore establishes AI agent workflow orchestration as a distinct analytical category within materials discovery and identifies the reporting, validation, and reproducibility conditions required for these systems to function as credible scientific infrastructure rather than as conversational demonstrations.
In this review, recent advances in material‐science agents from the complementary perspectives of autonomous design and autonomous experimentation are highlighted and a staged roadmap is proposed to facilitate the development of a standardized, reliable, and increasingly autonomous ecosystem for next‑generation materia...
Tong-Bo Jiang, Zheng-Yang Zhang, Ming-Shuo Nie et al.· Advanced Functional Material...· 0 citations
This article examines the emerging paradigm of agentic AI for scientific discovery, traces the conceptual shift from tools to agents, lays out a six-stage workflow spanning literature synthesis to manuscript generation, and reviews practical systems in chemistry, equation discovery, materials science, and general machi...
Alexander Taktakidze· Longevity Horizon· 1 citation
This review examines how current systems translate materials questions into computational tasks, identifies the settings in which reliability and recovery have been demonstrated, and explains why runnable calculations should be distinguished from scientifically justified conclusions.
MUSE is presented, an interactive meta-agent that enhances user understanding and control of agentic data science systems by dynamically restructuring low-level execution traces into multiple semantic levels that support navigation from high-level overviews to low-level implementation details.
Wei-Hao Chen, Weixi Tong, Yuan Tian et al.· 0 citations
This survey bridges the existing gap by presenting a comprehensive blueprint for scientific agents' design and introduces a unified taxonomy based on capability envelope and capability maturity, characterizing both the scope of scientific workflow coverage and the reliability of agent behavior under realistic research...
Xin-Ming Wang, Jian Xu, Sheng Lian et al.· IEEE Transactions on Pattern...· 11 citations
Self-driving laboratories can explore synthesis conditions autonomously, but their decision-making layer is typically a black-box optimizer, and the output is a set of optimized samples, with the measurements reduced to predefined scalar objectives and the reasons behind success left unarticulated. Here we present SynA...
Izumi Takahara, K. Nishio, Akira Aiba et al.· 1 citation
We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads.
See our Cookie Policy.