Skip to content
Open access

Understanding end-user contexts and identifying design preferences of an artificial intelligence-based clinical decision support tool for early autism detection

Jul 2026 · JAMIA Open · Vol 9 · 0 citations · 50 references
Medicine

TL;DR

This study evaluates the context for clinical decision support (CDS) deployment and identifies design preferences, which will inform the design of an AI-based CDS tool for autism detection, providing workflow-informed integration points and user preferences.

Abstract

Abstract Objectives Building on innovations for autism detection—where artificial intelligence (AI)-based models monitor clinical data within electronic health records—this study evaluates the context for clinical decision support (CDS) deployment and identifies design preferences. Materials and Methods This observational study utilized contextual inquiry to elicit perspectives from 8 clinicians and twenty caregivers during 18- to 24-month well-child visits at Duke-affiliated clinics. Data were analyzed using rapid qualitative analysis techniques. Results Workflow analysis identified 6 user tasks, 3 technology-user interactions, and 5 clinical decision points. Technologies that streamlined screening included patient portals, digital tablets, and note templates. Clinicians identified 2 major barriers—limited screening tool accuracy and challenges in implementing follow-up steps—and 3 facilitators: electronic screening, early intervention provider input, and staff referral coordination support. For design, CDS should include clear, actionable outputs, with explanations of prediction data, visual summaries linked to next steps, and educational resources. Embedding CDS within the EHR, with outputs delivered at key points during the clinical encounter, along with caregiver-facing materials, would improve workflow efficiency. Discussion Findings highlight key integration points for an autism detection AI-based CDS tool and stress the need for clinical utility and caregiver-centered communication. Effective design requires alignment with clinical workflow, including the timing of outputs, meaningful explanations, and integration with caregiver communication. Conclusion Findings will inform the design of an AI-based CDS tool for autism detection, providing workflow-informed integration points and user preferences. Future work should refine explainability and optimize delivery of outputs within clinical encounters to support decision-making and caregiver engagement.

Read PDF

Similar papers

Open access Aug 2026

Developing an integrated algorithm to support autism diagnostic decisions: Model performance and statistical fairness

Machine learning can support diagnosticians in this effort, as demonstrated here utilizing multiple rating scales, the TASI, and the TAP, but there is a risk for bias when using machine learning and as such, no algorithm should replace expert clinical judgment.

Aaron J. Kaat, Ashlynn Campagna, Hannah Feiner et al. · 0 citations
Jul 2026

What Clinicians Need: Designing, Developing and Evaluating an AI-Based Decision Support System for Autism Assessment

AI methods promise to support autism spectrum condition (ASC) diagnostics in adults, a complex and time-consuming process, that is characterized by a shortage of specialized clinicians. To date, clinicians'needs and their interaction with such AI-based support remain underexplored. Our work aims to develop and evaluate...

U. Schäfer, William Saakyan, Matthias Norden et al. · 0 citations
Open access Aug 2026

Feasibility and Acceptability of an AI-Driven Conversational Platform for Structured Autism History Taking and Referral Support: Mixed Methods Proof-of-Concept Study

Abstract Background Autism spectrum disorder is underdiagnosed in adults, with increasing demand on diagnostic services and prolonged waiting times. AI-powered tools may offer scalable solutions for early screening and triage. Objective This proof-of-concept study aimed to evaluate the feasibility, acceptability, and u...

Shabnam Sadeghi Esfahlani, Louise Prothero, N. Abdulmohdi et al. · 0 citations
Review Open access Sep 2026

Dementia Carers' Perspectives on Paper- and Artificial Intelligence (AI)-Based Assessment Tools: A Qualitative Think-Aloud Study Using the COM-B Framework.

ObjectivesCarer observations provide valuable longitudinal and contextual information for dementia assessment, but traditional informant-based questionnaires may limit reporting of nuanced, fluctuating changes. Artificial intelligence (AI)-based tools may offer greater flexibility to report, but their successful uptake...

Labhpreet Kaur, A. Griffiths, Louis Stokes et al. · 0 citations
Review Open access Sep 2026

From Unimodal Tools to Multimodal Systems: A Structured Narrative Review of Selected Early-Childhood Screening, Assessment, and Monitoring Applications

Early-childhood digital screening, clinician-supervised assessment, and monitoring use smartphone images, home video, interaction audio, caregiver questionnaires, and non-contact sensors. Yet “multimodal” is sometimes applied when distinct patient-level inputs are not jointly modeled. This structured narrative review e...

Jihoon Moon · 0 citations
Conference Aug 2026

A Scalable Interoperable Data Science System for Trauma-Informed Care: Enhancing ACE Interventions with Real-Time Analytics, AI-Powered Insights, and Clinical Decision Support

Adverse Childhood Experiences (ACEs) remain a critical public health challenge, with long-term effects on physical health, mental well-being, and socioeconomic outcomes. Despite ongoing trauma-informed care (TIC) initiatives, existing systems lack integrated, real-time data analytics and accessible decision-support too...

Mohmmad Arif Shaik, Andrea Meyer Stinson, Audrey Idaikkadar et al. · 0 citations

We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads. See our Cookie Policy.