This study focuses on the initial stages of a broader design project aimed at developing a GenAI mediator for consensus-oriented online deliberation, and derives design knowledge, articulated through design requirements, for emotion-aware GenAI mediation.
Abstract
AI-supported deliberation platforms increasingly support large-scale participation in public policymaking. Yet their design reflects strong rationalistic and emotion reductionist bias: while they structure arguments, cluster opinions, visualize disagreement or organize discussions, they largely ignore the emotional dynamics through which participants interpret claims, react to disagreement and sustain engagement. This blind spot is particularly problematic in discussions surrounding wicked public issues, where emotions are not peripheral but integral to how actors evaluate arguments and orient themselves toward collective consensus-oriented decisions. At the same time, recent advances in Generative Artificial Intelligence (GenAI) introduce new possibilities for interacting with emotional signals in digital communication. Beyond content processing, GenAI systems can detect, interpret, and generate context-sensitive emotional expressions; this opens the possibility of GenAI-mediated emotional support in deliberative environments. This study explores how such systems could be designed. Following an echeloned Design Science Research approach, the paper focuses on the initial stages of a broader design project aimed at developing a GenAI mediator for consensus-oriented online deliberation. The problem space is examined through an analysis of 3 existing deliberation platforms and a semisystematic literature review of 25 papers on emotional dynamics in consensus-oriented discussions. Using a three-step thematic synthesis, the study derives design knowledge, articulated through design requirements, for emotion-aware GenAI mediation. The results of this study consist of two outcomes. First, the analysis formulates a problem statement that identifies a gap in current deliberation platforms: while they organize informational exchanges, emotional dynamics remain unmodeled. Second, the study derives six design requirements that define the design space a solution must satisfy: emotional awareness, emotional regulation, emotional inclusive design, emotional stability, emotional conflict transformation, and emotional articulation. These findings contribute to an initial body of design knowledge that bridges research on emotions in deliberation with emerging capabilities of GenAI; they lay the groundwork for designing emotion-aware GenAI-mediated deliberations.
Emotional dialogue research includes two influential strategy traditions. Empathetic dialogue prioritizes understanding a speaker's emotional experience. Emotional support conversation selects and sequences support for the seeker's current needs. Sustained use introduces a further goal. Effective support should sustain...
Ming Wang, Jiaqi Wu Young, Wenfang Wu et al.· arXiv.org· 0 citations
A multi-agent refinement process that iteratively improves LLM-driven counter-narratives for persuasiveness, emotional engagement, and shareability is introduced, highlighting a pathway toward scalable, narrative-specific interventions against hate speech and misinformation.
Carmel Kronfeld, Sharva Gogawale, Tetsuro Kobayashi et al.· 0 citations
It is found that emotional polarization becomes more persistent after 2020 and is more strongly associated with higher levels of technological simplification and emotion-oriented interaction dynamics, consistent with the view that major platforms are linked to changes in public-opinion dynamics in platform-mediated env...
Chang-Rong Lu, Dan Qin, Jiali Huang et al.· PLoS ONE· 0 citations
In the context of growing affective polarization, climate backlash and emotionally charged climate mobilizations, this article argues that theorists of environmental democracy must take affect and emotions seriously. Drawing on early feminist and ecofeminist critiques of deliberative democracy as well as ecological ago...
L. Knops, Léna Silberzahn· Environmental Values· 0 citations
Results show that structuring ethical recommendations through a plural AI architecture enhances consumers’ self–brand connection and strengthens self-brand connection and purchase intentions, suggesting plurality can function as an equity-enhancing design feature.
Amidst escalating global concern about the intensification of bushfire (wildfire), we investigate how interactive, data-driven articles shape people’s engagement with this expanding environmental crisis. We build on critical discourse that positions climate informatics products as sociopolitical actors, as well as rese...
Madeleine Antonellos, Nicola J. Bidwell, Sarah Webber· The Compass· 0 citations
Related blog posts
MIT News · Artificial Intelligence· news.mit.eduOct 1, 2026
With $2.1 million funding from Google.org, the open-source Public Transit Intelligence Hub will unify public transit monitoring, operations, and passenger communication.
Able to defeat top-ranked human players and more efficient than other models, the new system could help decision-makers in military maneuvers or business negotiations.
We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads.
See our Cookie Policy.