Teachers’ Perceptions of the Competency-Based Curriculum and Its Impact on Teaching Instructional Practices
Abstract
Despite Rwanda’s adoption of the Competency-Based Curriculum (CBC) to promote learner-centered, skills-oriented education, evidence suggests a persistent gap between curriculum intentions and classroom practices. This study examines teachers’ perceptions and instructional practices in implementing the CBC, with a focus on the alignment between curriculum intentions, instructional planning, and classroom practices. The study employed a sequential explanatory research design. Quantitative data were collected through structured questionnaires administered to teachers, while qualitative data were generated from semi-structured interviews, classroom observations, and document analysis of lesson plans and schemes of work. Quantitative findings indicate that teachers hold generally positive perceptions of the CBC (M = 3.87, SD = 0.64), particularly regarding its relevance to real-life skills and learner engagement. However, the level of classroom implementation was moderate (M = 3.12, SD = 0.71), revealing a gap between beliefs and practice. Regression analysis indicated that teachers' perceptions were a statistically significant predictor of instructional practices (β = 0.48, p < .01), explaining variation in instructional practices without implying causality. Qualitative results corroborate these findings, revealing conceptual ambiguity in translating competencies into instructional activities, weak alignment between objectives, teaching strategies, and assessment, and a predominance of surface-level learner-centered practices. Additionally, contextual constraints such as inadequate professional development, limited instructional resources, and large class sizes were found to hinder effective implementation. The study concludes that while teachers demonstrate strong conceptual support for CBC, its implementation remains constrained by cognitive, pedagogical, and systemic factors. It underscores the need for sustained professional development, improved resource provision, and stronger alignment between curriculum design and classroom realities to achieve meaningful educational reform.